Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-30-2003-5
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 09-30-2003
>
Agenda - 09-30-2003-5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 3:25:09 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:51:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/30/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20030930
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
would be given the opportunity to participate in the CAMPO process, ideally <br />as members of the TAC and TCC. <br />• Staffing Function -Another element this organizational option calls for <br />includes changes to the CAMPO staffing function including distancing the <br />staff functions from the City of Raleigh and expanding staff expertise and size <br />to meet current and future CAMPO member needs and federal planning <br />requirements. <br />• Additional Committees -Finally, this organizational structure calls for the <br />establishment of additional advisory committees to enhance and broaden the <br />diversity of opinions considered in the CAMPO decision-making process. <br />- Option 2: Formal Regional Coordination, Modified CAMPO Organizational <br />Structure, and Consolidated Regional MPO Staff Function <br />This organizational option envisions all the changes proposed in the first <br />organizational option, but combines the staffing function with that of DCHC <br />while maintaining the Policy indepe ence of the ;CAMP£O process. <br />• Formal Regzon <br />..::~v .. <br />as en~isi~ <br />1(1 <br />~ ~`~ ~ ~~°~ - - -- ---~-~--- ~k mar=. ,~,. <br />Staf~ng"~ Function - In this option, the staffmg funchon~i f :combined for <br />DiCHC and CAMPO and housed at and administered'~b a third party <br />`givernment organization. Ideally, the third party would be an existing <br />organization with which CAMPO and DCHC member jurisdictions aze <br />already familiar and in whose processes they already participate. In the <br />Triangle region, both the TJCOG and the TTA potentially meet that <br />description. The staffmg function would be established through <br />intergovernmental agreement and funded using the same sources of funding as <br />are currently used. <br />• Additional Committees -Same as envisioned in Option 1. <br />- Option 3: Consolidated Regional MPO <br />In this organizational option, the DCHC and CAMPO member jurisdictions <br />would join with neighboring non-MPO jurisdictions to form a single MPO <br />covering amulti-county planning area. <br />• Formal Regional Coordination -Regional coordination becomes an internal <br />MPO function in this organizational option as the MPO boundaries include <br />the entire region. <br />ix <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.