Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2003-8h
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 09-16-2003
>
Agenda - 09-16-2003-8h
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 4:57:01 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:51:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8h
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20030916
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
ORD-2003-113 Development Open Burning Restrictions (Zoning, Subdivision & Erosion Control)
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2003
ORD-2003-114 Development Open Burning Restrictions (Zoning, Subdivision & Erosion Control)
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the Chapel Hill portion of the ETJ or Transition Area and by Carrboro within the Carrboro <br />portion of the ETJ or Transition Area. <br />Chapel Hill and Carrboro were notified of these amendments prior to the public hearing through <br />the normal agenda distribution of the public hearing and Planning Board meeting packets. Both <br />jurisdictions are also on the mail out list for the Board of County Commissioners agenda. <br />Discussion Points at Public Hearing <br />1. Can counties define `bona-fide' farms? <br />No, enabling legislation does not give counties the ability to redefine bona-fide farms. <br />2. Is the term `bona-fide farm' used for tax purposes? <br />No, use value for tax purposes is not the same as bona-fide farm in the zoning <br />ordinance. Some properties may be in one or the other or both. <br />3. Question concerning cross-referencing in these amendments to the County's recycling <br />ordinance. <br />Process: <br />1) Public Hearing held on May 27, 2003 <br />2) Planning Board on August 6, 2003 recommended approval of the Development <br />Open Burning Restrictions (Zoning and Subdivision) <br />3) BOCC to make decision <br />FINANCIAL IMPACT: There are no public fiscal impacts associated with this decision. <br />RECOMMENDATION(S): Administration recommends APPROVAL of the attached <br />ordinance amendments. <br />The Planning Board recommends APPROVAL of the <br />Development Open Burning Restrictions to the Zoning Ordinance <br />and the Subdivision Regulations. <br />The Planning StafF recommends APPROVAL of the attached <br />ordinance amendments. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.