Browse
Search
Agenda - 09-16-2003-8h
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 09-16-2003
>
Agenda - 09-16-2003-8h
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 4:57:01 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:51:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
9/16/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8h
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20030916
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
ORD-2003-113 Development Open Burning Restrictions (Zoning, Subdivision & Erosion Control)
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2003
ORD-2003-114 Development Open Burning Restrictions (Zoning, Subdivision & Erosion Control)
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
15 <br />to take her child to school. She agrees that kids should be traveling to schools by foot or <br />bike or public transportation and this is not available with the Eubanks Road site. She <br />expressed appreciation to the school board and administration for the way in which they <br />have involved the community in this decision. <br />Commissioner Gordon entered into the record a letter from Chapel Hill High School <br />Governance Committee, which urges the Board of Commissioners to support the Rock <br />Haven Road site as proposed by the CHCCS Board. <br />C. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS -Chaired By Planning Board Vice Chair Hunter <br />Schofield <br />1. Orange County Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments <br />a. Amend Articles 8, 12, 14, 21, 22, and Table of Contents and <br />other related articles to define and regulate the open burning <br />of trees, limbs, stumps and construction debris associated <br />with permitted activity. <br />Planning Director Craig Benedict made this presentation. The first item has to do with <br />enabling legislation to be able to restrict open burning when it has to do with <br />development activity. Types of development that could be regulated include major and <br />minor subdivisions, zoning compliance for building permits, and land disturbing activities <br />requiring Erosion Control approvals. Development not regulated includes activities <br />relating to bona fide farms, approved forestry management plans, and burning of <br />domestically produced yard debris by private homeowners/tenants. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked County Attorney Geof Gledhill about the definition of bona <br />fide farm and if it was the same definition that the State uses or if there was some <br />leeway. Geof Gledhill said that the enabling legislation has a definition for bona fide <br />farms. The special legislation that Orange County received to allow it to regulate open <br />burning in the permitting of developments includes things that are not in the definition of <br />bona fide farms such as horticulture and silviculture. Counties do not have the flexibility <br />to redefine the terms. <br />Commissioner Jacobs asked about the way in which the references to the burning and <br />the disposition of construction debris are mentioned. He asked why we would not <br />mention that there is a recyclable materials recovery ordinance each time we mention <br />construction debris, because it regulates how the debris is supposed to be disposed of. <br />Craig Benedict said that he would work with Geof Gledhill to see if it can be <br />incorporated. He said that this is for land use and not solid waste and he will try and <br />cross-reference this. <br />Chair Brown said that she is unclear about bona fide farms and if it has anything to do <br />with the tax valuation of property and Geof Gledhill said no. He said that the definition of <br />use value taxation where the use value is based on farm is not the same definition as <br />bona fide farm and the prohibition against counties regulating through zoning regulations <br />bona fide farms. There will be some farms qualified under each and they are only <br />coincidentally related to each other. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.