Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-25-2003-c1ab
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 08-25-2003
>
Agenda - 08-25-2003-c1ab
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 4:18:32 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:50:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/25/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
c1ab
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20030825
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
ORD-2003-107 Concurrent Amendments to Orange County Zoning Ordinance and Orange County Subdivision Regulations Regarding Subdivision Size, Location, Process, and Standards
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~~ <br />prepare a Special Use Permit approval process for large-scale residential development projects. <br />These amendments are the result of that directive. <br />Growth Management -The discussion of managing growth and development led to two primary <br />issues; What was the scale of the project? (i.e. how many lots), and Where is the project being <br />proposed? The facets of this proposal will encourage the appropriate scaling of subdivisions. <br />For example, an 80-lot subdivision in Cedar Grove would have a different impact, both visually, <br />environmentally, and from a public services provision standpoint, than it would if it were located <br />in a Water/Sewer Primary Service Area just outside of Hillsborough. The proposed System <br />promotes subdivision design at scales consistent with arural/agricultural character or urban <br />character depending upon geographic location within the County. <br />In addition to putting forth growth regulations that manage the size and location of projects, this <br />proposal includes additional land development performance standards depending on the scale <br />of the project. In essence, the larger the project, the more complex research and analysis is <br />necessary to ameliorate the potential impact of the project. <br />This proposal divides the subdivision approval process into three main categories depending on <br />the location and the number of lots proposed. <br />Au_gust 2003 proposal <br />CATEGORY_ 1 <br />1) Type: Standard Major <br />Lots: 6-19 <br />Districts: All zoning districts (same subdivision process that is currently in effect) <br />Map Color. Green, Rural Area and Tan, Urbanizing Area <br />CATEGORY 2 <br />2a) Type: Class A SUP Rural <br />Lofs: 20-40 <br />Districts: Rural Buffer, Agricultural Residential, and R1 Outside of Primary Service <br />Area of Water and Sewer Boundary Agreement <br />Map Color. Green, Rural Area <br />2b) Type: Class A SUP Urbanizing Level I Analysis <br />Lots: 20-40 <br />Districts: R-1 and EDD zoning in Primary Service Area of Water and Sewer Boundary <br />Agreement <br />Map Color. Tan, Urbanizing Area <br />2c) Type: Class A SUP Urbanizing Level II Analysis <br />Lots: 41-79 <br />Districts: R-1 and EDD zoning in Primary Service Area of Water and Sewer Boundary <br />Agreement <br />Map Color. Tan, Urbanizing Area <br />G:\Current Planning Division\ROBERT~August 2003 PH\Abstract-SUP Major Subd Process PH Revised 081803.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.