Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-26-2003-8n
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 06-26-2003
>
Agenda - 06-26-2003-8n
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:00:42 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:48:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/26/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8n
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20030626
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
ORD-2003-037 - Outdoor Lighting Standards Zoning Ordinance Amendment
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ai <br />- If Planning Board fails to make a recommendation within the allocated time, the <br />application shall be forwarded to the BOCC without a Planning Board recommendation. <br />• BOCC makes final decision. <br />RECOMMENDATION(S): Planning Staff recommends APPROVAL of the proposed <br />Amendment. <br />Carla Thames presented an overview of the proposed Ordinance <br />Thames: Our ordinance as it stands now has a reference that requires to submission of additional <br />documents to include lighting. Lighting plans do not have performance standards for review. <br />Several goals that we are trying to achieve with the Outdoor Lighting Standard are promoting <br />energy conservation, reducing light pollution, and preventing light trespass onto adjacent <br />properties. Discuss Information/Issues at Public Hearing on February 24, 2003". Requested <br />information on where the flood light standards were derived from. Requested an example of <br />"temporary lighting". What is the cost of amortization or shielding of existing lights? <br />Benedict: Instead of mechanical shields, the lights may be painted which may not be completely <br />effective but may be an interim solution. <br />Gooding-Ray: Is there any way we can do this before the fixtures go out? <br />Benedict: That is something we could explore. <br />Thames: Condition that requires solar lighting for subdivision signage. Solar lighting is not in <br />the plan yet. Request information on the cost of inspecting lights. Legal opinion requested <br />regarding whether or not the County has the authority to regulate publicly funded streetlights. <br />One of the Commissioners suggested we incorporate that into the plan only in subdivisions. The <br />original standards exempted streetlights but DOT requested that we comply with their standards <br />that they be included. Request the Chamber of Commerce be notified and give the opportunity <br />to review and comment. <br />Benedict: Our proposal will be where we do have clear authority we will ask for these new <br />standards and where there is unclear authority, we will have a section of the ordinance that says <br />"in these other situations, we suggest or strongly encourage the use of these standards mentioned <br />by these other authorities", such as Duke Power, DOT, etc. <br />Thames: One area of the ordinance that allows upward lighting is for the US Flag in cases where <br />it is not taken down at night. I need find the definition for a governmental flag? <br />Triebel: Concerned that the seasonal decoration sections allowed too much time. <br />Gooding-Ray: Changes to 6.31.4 D, H and a definition of a governmental flag. We also need a <br />definition of "upward". <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.