Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-26-2003-8n
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 06-26-2003
>
Agenda - 06-26-2003-8n
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:00:42 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:48:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/26/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8n
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20030626
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
ORD-2003-037 - Outdoor Lighting Standards Zoning Ordinance Amendment
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ <br />Orange Count <br />Commission for the ~n~ironment <br />c/o Orange County ERCD <br />306-A Revere Road / PO Box 8181 <br />Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br />Phone: (919) 245-2590, Fax: (919) 644-3351 <br />Memorandum <br />To: Nicole Gooding-Ray, Chair <br />Orange County Planning Board <br />From: Cara Crisler and Richard Whisnant, Co-Chairs <br />Orange County Commission for the Environment <br />Date: March 21, 2003 <br />Re: Proposed Outdoor Lighting Standards Amendments <br />The Commission for the Environment discussed the proposed amendments to <br />the Zoning Ordinance addressing outdoor lighting standards at its March 10 <br />meeting. <br />The Commission supports the idea of outdoor lighting standards and commends <br />the staff for this proposal. Light pollution is a problem that has been raised by <br />members of the Commission in the past and the Commission feels that Orange <br />County should take proactive steps to begin dealing with the problem. If the <br />Planning Board's review process for the proposed ordinance ultimately stretches <br />beyond the currently planned timeline, the Commissiort would like to discuss and <br />review the ordinance in greater detail than time permitted on March 10. However, <br />there are issues that the Commission agreed and voted to forward to you at this <br />time: <br />Are there sections from model ordinances or ordinances (such as Sedona, <br />Arizona) that we might ead bhave been appliedeand ref ned elsewhere?w <br />language that might alr y <br />• Are the exemptions from the ordinance too broad? The Commission noted <br />that the exemption of all single-family residences from the Environmental <br />Impact Ordinance has been identified as a shortcoming in that existing <br />document. <br />GE CO TY <br />NORTH CAROLINA <br />CELEBRATING 150 YEARS <br />~}~~ ~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.