Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-26-2003-8n
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 06-26-2003
>
Agenda - 06-26-2003-8n
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:00:42 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:48:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/26/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8n
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20030626
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
ORD-2003-037 - Outdoor Lighting Standards Zoning Ordinance Amendment
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
g p~AT a~ <br />~~wo <br />"One caveat to that, to governmental agencies is that when you use cut-off fixturWe first <br />1 <br />2 requires more fixtures in a given area toCh rr fotte Metrop titan area over 20 yearos agoyand it a as <br />3 experimented with cut-off lighting in the <br />ve many advantages, but one of its disadvantag samehi luminationeS it takes more lights m <br />4 ry ratio and the <br />5 distance to have the same uniformity <br />6 that this is <br />7 "So, what that translates to is more ~o illuma ateca subdiv sio'nglim not DsaOying <br />8 municipalities, even private parties that want <br />9 a bad thing. It is just a fact of life that will happen in many cases. <br />10 va or. One thing to <br />11 "The other item I tacueR ntly, thalt s thehlowr~ost'toption a approved by the Utility <br />'12 keep in mind on that is tha , a flies. Mercury vapor is available in cut-off fixtures so the light <br />13 Commission for most requesting p <br />14 pollution issue would be address but the consumption issue would remain. a flat <br />15 <br />16 "One side note about the consumps'ed on flat rate a Mercury vapor fixtu~e is a low-cost <br />17 rate, it's not based on consumption, it ~s ba <br />18 o tion because it is less cost to install and it's less of the fac I'i ies and the tcost that Duke Power <br />P <br />19 are based on the cost of the consumption, the cos <br />20 has to expend going out there and makingou h t Isrmore efficient!ISo there are some trade-offs. <br />21 involved than the mercury vapor, even th g <br />22 It's not a linear comparison that can be made sometimes. <br />23 <br />24 "The other thing is that the electricity that ises but the gotwer system that Duke Powere <br />25 energy. I know that is hard to comprehend sometim P <br />26 and the other utilities use to generate electricity is that g enerati ndwhether weouse' igortnot. And <br />27 which occur during the daytime. We have to build g <br />28 at night when the load is down, we've still got that gednu ratio eak timese at's kilnd of I kerbu ding a <br />29 And using it for illumination actually offsets the co 9 P . <br />30 four-lane road to get to Kenan Stadium but you only needs itof thte yea wand offset the,co s of ~ at <br />31 road there all, it would be nice if you could use it every Y <br />32 and that is how lighting is viewed. Ana agoves forlus to build the maintenance cost are <br />33 considered in what the Commission pp <br />34 <br />35 "In closing, I would like to say that Duke Power, and I, mY~eciateothe opportun ty we'vee <br />36 the dialogue with the County and other interested parties. We app <br />37 had so far. We look forward to getting effective, and simple and, ultimately, workable Ordinance." <br />38 "is there anyone who was not signed up to speak who would <br />39 A. Nicole Gooding-Ray <br />40 like to speak to this tssue at this time? OK." <br />I didn t see <br />41 <br />42 Barry Jacobs "I would like to mak ss ns r-hoicmh a~etbasca ly advert'i ng signs. We don't light . <br />43 anything in here about subdmsion g <br />44. our street signs. I don't see why we would allow the lighting of subdivision signs. <br />45 <br />46 "I would like to second Mr. Bndationo havetalshmplet cleanerway of olok ngrat fixtures <br />47 keeping with Duke Power recomme <br />48 on a periodic basis. I don't know how that ta~ki~s about allnstreet ligh~ts.yl'm not sure we have <br />49 publicly -funded street lights or rf you are g <br />50 control over publicly-funded street lights, but we do have over privately-funded street fights. <br />51 Probably the grossest tight polluter in central Orange County is DOTs new interchange at <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.