Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
2 s <br />3 <br />5 J <br />6 <br />8 <br />10 <br />11 <br />12 <br />13 <br />14 <br />15 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />26 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />36 <br />37 <br />38 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />46 <br />47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />~~~~ <br />4 <br />~ ~ .~ <br />~~ <br />"So that is in essence where we are going with the new amendments to onizle a note that <br />tandards. That is all for the presentation that Robert has tonight. We did recog <br />came in from Duke Power that mentioned athat some Harts were good and they would I ke to <br />ust read this before the meeting, they said P <br />work with us on some other parts that discusdsaed auto new development and th ngs I ke'th tghat <br />We do have certain clauses about this woul PP Y I in some of these new concepts <br />we have been working with the industry~and have been app Y 9 <br />with some new projects that h unctional and Iusablel'by the developmentacommunity and by the <br />optimistic that these are both f <br />electric contractors and by the power compani ers that haversigned up and we canemovte to'that <br />able to field them, if not, there are some speak <br />section. <br />Someone on the Planning Board had a question that I could not hear. <br />Another question I could not hear. <br />I~ <br />Chair Brown asked if they were going to get a response from the staff on all the <br />questions brought forward by Duke Power. Craig Benedict said they would respond item <br />by item before they go to the Planning Board. <br />Commissioner Carey had a question about section 6.31.6H, regarding intrusiveness of <br />fighting. He wanted to know what non-conforming meant regarding sliding scale. Craig <br />Benedict explained this. <br />Public Comment: <br />Mark Smith - OC Commission for the Environment. `Thank you for all the work you do <br />every day doing this commissioner stuff. It is scary for me to look at your schedules. So does <br />everyone have this in front of you? Here comes Craig with that, I do not know if we have <br />enough for the Planning Board people. This is a presentation I prepared a while ago and gave <br />to the Commission for the Environment and then to some people on the Planning Board and I <br />guess originated the Ordinance you are seeing now and I am not going to go through the whole . <br />thing, it takes a little longer than I think is reasonable given that you've got like four sessions <br />going for one. <br />the amount <br />"But there is a lot of information in here about what light pollution consists of, <br />of waste, the environment impacts that are involved, security and safety issues, and a lot of <br />things that Craig already touched on. I am not going to go over all that again. I think just for <br />reference purposes, let's go ahead and flip to the pictures here, which Craig can put them up <br />then: too, the good, the bad, and the ugly. <br />`I just want to give us all a (and I am going to apologize to everyone in the room here, <br />you are going to go home looking at light fixtures, driving down the road now and moaning <br />about bad lighting and good lighting, at least until we get this Ordinance implemented, not for <br />the rest of your natural life hopefully). So the first 3 of these basically give you and idea of what <br />good basic lighting designs are. <br />`And the idea with this Ordinance, as I am looking at it, is to just have good fixtures put <br />in and it is a pretty simple matter; it is just an engineering, a technical fix. The idea is to have <br />the light shining down on the things that you want to light up.and not in your eyes, not creating <br />glare and not creating safety and security concems where you can't see what you are supposed <br />