Orange County NC Website
3 <br />• Injunction and Abatement -Zoning Officer may ask Court of competent jurisdiction to <br />prevent violation from continuing and/or to order abatement. <br />• Stop Work Order -Zoning Officer may post and issue Stop Work Order to compel offender <br />to cease work and bring property into compliance. <br />Current Subdivision Regulations <br />The current Subdivision Regulations also provide four (4) enforcement mechanisms (listed <br />below). The appeal process on staff decisions for subdivision matters is to the Board of County <br />Commissioners, not the Board of Adjustment. As is the case in the Zoning Ordinance, there are <br />limited details on the notification of violations and the citation procedure. <br />• Criminal Action -Offender guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by fine of no more than $50 <br />or thirty-(30) days in jail. <br />• Civil Penalties -Offender subject to fee of $50. County may collect in the nature of a debt if <br />penalty not paid within ten (10) days after citing of violation. Penalties accrue daily. <br />• Injunction and Abatement -Planning Director may ask Court of competent jurisdiction to <br />prevent violation from continuing. <br />A. Information/Issues at Public Hearing on February 24, 2003 <br />1) Need for Purpose and Intent section to address the County's objective for voluntary <br />Ordinance compliance over formal enforcement measures. <br />a. The proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations <br />(hereafter collectively referred to as "Ordinances") have been amended to add a <br />Purpose and Intent section to clarify that enforcement is the top priority, not collection <br />of civil penalties. <br />2) Need for initial contact with offender to be of a personal nature (in person or telephone <br />call). <br />a. The proposed Ordinances have been amended so that initial contact with offender <br />will be made in person or by teleph <br />b. one. <br />3) Concern over posting of notice on property (absentee landowner-tenant removes posted <br />notice-landowner unaware of violation). <br />a. Ordinances allow for various methods of notice. The proposed Ordinances have <br />been amended to require the Planning Department to attempt, in every case, to <br />provide the violator with written notice of the violation either in person or by certified <br />mail. Posting, when used along with notice by regular mail, remains an option only <br />when the violator does not claim or refuses to accept a notice of violation by certified <br />mail. <br />4) In addressing zoning violations that have ceased, yet re-occur within two (2) years, what <br />would happen if the property were to be sold? How would the violation be handled? <br />a. The proposed Zoning Ordinance has been amended to state that a new notice is not <br />required when a notice of violation of the same kind/type has been issued to the <br />same violator within the previous two years. However, with such continuing <br />violations, a single new notice of civil penalty citation for a continuing violation may <br />be issued. In every instance a new notice of violation will be required if the property <br />has been sold to an entity different from the owner initially notified. <br />5) Concern over allowing Zoning Officer to issue civil penalty citations and to settle <br />monetary penalties. No public recourse to approach BOCC to discuss violation or to <br />give BOCC ability to allow for extensions of time limits to correct Zoning Violations. <br />G/Current Planning/robert/final enforcement documents/ bocc abstract 6 26 2003 <br />