Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-17-2003-9c
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 06-17-2003
>
Agenda - 06-17-2003-9c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:37:05 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:48:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/17/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9c
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20030617
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~`~ <br />Orange Count <br />` `' ~ ~ ?' '- Conunission fc~r the Environment <br />8^,. 3~... r ~- <br />_ ~~ ; ' ~~- a; c/o Orange County ERCD <br />_ ~ 306-A Revere Road / PO Box 8181 <br />` Hillsborough, NC 27278 <br />_F_ "~'~ Phone: (919) 245-2590, Fax: (919) 644-3351 <br />{ <br />~~~ - <br />.,, <br />Memorandum <br />To: Nicole Gooding-Ray, Chair <br />Orange County Planning Board <br />From: Cara Crisler and Richard Whisnant, Co-Chairs <br />Orange County Commission for the Environment <br />Date: March 21, 2003 <br />Re: Proposed Outdoor Lighting Standards Amendments <br />The Commission for the Environment discussed the proposed amendments to <br />the Zoning Ordinance addressing outdoor lighting standards at its March 10 <br />meeting. <br />The Commission supports the idea of outdoor lighting standards and commends <br />the staff for this proposal. Light pollution is a problem that has been raised by <br />members of the Commission in the past and the Commission feels that Orange <br />County should take proactive steps to begin dealing with the problem. If the <br />Planning Board's review process for the proposed ordinance ultimately stretches <br />beyond the currently planned timeline, the Commission would like to discuss and <br />review the ordinance in greater detail than time permitted on March 10. However, <br />there are issues that the Commission agreed and voted to forward to you at this <br />time: <br />• Are there sections from model ordinances or ordinances (such as Sedona, <br />Arizona) that we might be able to use in Orange County, so as to borrow <br />language that might already have been applied and refined elsewhere? <br />• Are the exemptions from the ordinance too broad? The Commission noted <br />that the exemption of all single-family residences from the Environmental <br />Impact Ordinance has been identified as a shortcoming in that existing <br />document. <br />GRANGE COUNTY <br />~ -Mx;. <br />~O <br />NORTH CAROLINA <br />CELE BIUTIN6 150 YEARS <br />~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.