Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
<br />5. Evaluation Process Design and Administration <br /> <br />• Develop a formal evaluation protocol, including: <br />o Application submission guidelines <br />o Reviewer roles and conflict-of-interest policies <br />o Scoring procedures and documentation standards <br />• Train reviewers (Performance Evaluation Committee) on protocols and scorecard <br />• Administer the scoring process, including: <br />o Compilation and validation of project applications <br />o Facilitation of scoring sessions <br />o Quality assurance and consistency checks <br /> <br />Deliverable: Completed scoring records and preliminary project rankings <br /> <br />6. Funding Recommendations and Reporting <br /> <br />• Analyze scoring results and develop funding recommendations consistent with the <br />HUN NOFO <br />• Ensure alignment with HUD priorities, including reallocation considerations where <br />appropriate. <br />• Prepare a final report including: <br />o Project rankings <br />o Summary of evaluation methodology <br />o Key findings and system-level insights <br />• Present recommendations to CoC leadership and governing board <br /> <br />Deliverable: Final Evaluation Report and Funding Recommendations <br /> <br />III. Guiding Principles <br /> <br />This work will be grounded in the following principles: <br /> <br />• Transparency: Clear criteria, open processes, and accessible documentation <br />• Fairness: Intentional inclusion of underserved populations and reduction of <br />disparities <br />• Data-Driven Decision Making: Use of reliable system and project-level data <br />• Collaboration: Meaningful engagement of stakeholders, including people with lived <br />experience <br />• Alignment with HUD Priorities: Ensuring compliance with current NOFO guidance <br />and best practices <br /> <br />IV. Timeline <br /> <br />Docusign Envelope ID: 81AACBE3-B6B1-849B-810A-CED0670D43F0