Browse
Search
OUTboard Meeting June 3, 2026
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange Unified Transportation Board
>
Agendas
>
2026
>
OUTboard Meeting June 3, 2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2026 5:04:14 PM
Creation date
6/10/2026 4:43:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2026
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 56-Orange County,NC I Bicycle&Pedestrian Plan Bicycle&Pedestrian Plan I Orange County,NC-Page 57 <br /> Workshop #2 - What We Heard �/ , , "'" Key Takeaways <br /> Chapel Hill Open House % <br /> Participants expressed strong <br /> The second public workshop was held support for incorporating bicycle Most supported policies: <br /> b <br /> on Wednesday,September 24,2025, and pedestrian connections into new <br /> at Orange County Waste&Recycling development. Many emphasized ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ • • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ • • ■ ■ • • ■ ■ ■ ■ • • ■ ■ • • ■ <br /> Administrative Office in Chapel Hill. aligning development codes with Proactive <br /> community plans,using multimodal Require bicycle Align dev m Utilize multimodal multimodal <br /> Co-hosted with the Orange County y p g g cross-sections <br /> and pedestrian <br /> Trails Plan,the event welcomed cross-sections to guide infrastructure code with planning and <br /> about a dozen participants for an design,and applying consistent land Connections community define <br /> new development comy plans infrastructure consistent land use <br /> interactive open house featuring use updates to support a connected plan updates <br /> multiple feedback stations. network.Overall,participants <br /> conveyed that bike and pedestrian <br /> At the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan facilities should be a standard part of <br /> station,residents were invited to: growth,not added later. I Preferred fund' pp hes: <br /> > View and comment on regional On funding,participants favored t <br /> tee <br /> ■ ■ • • • • • • • • ■ ■ • • • • • • • • manommensm <br /> maps showcasing facility proactive approaches,and suggested Bond referendum Very little support <br /> recommendations for all projects creative options such as reallocating y Dedicate local acceptable if for"business as <br /> and the 10 projects advanced to toll road funds or exploring a local is revenue sources <br /> p g tied to specific usual"funding <br /> concept development penny tax,underscoring support for to bike/ped transportation through existing <br /> a well-funded network in Orange pport improvements needs budgets CH.I <br /> > Share ideas about policies and <br /> funding and mark on a sliding <br /> County. <br /> scale what their preferences were <br /> Second public workshop participants interacting with project boards illustrating plan recommendations and analysis. CH.3 <br /> a� <br /> NA <br /> u <br /> I <br /> - - ` <br /> II I <br /> 1: <br /> i <br /> A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.