PB Agenda Packet 6-3-26 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

40 DRAFT 1868 out an email, geez, somewhere around the holidays about, I cannot remember if it was before or 1869 after December,with the slide decks and the audio and video for those work sessions about how 1870 you balance a true conservation subdivision that will preserve more than just the most 1871 environmentally sensitive areas that allows for smaller lot sizes, how do you achieve that balance, 1872 how do you integrate innovative community waste water and water systems into that and then 1873 what is the relationship to that to the cost of the home has all been presented to the 1874 commissioners as part of the land-use plan, and there is no easy answer there for me or for you or 1875 for the elected board, so I think that we do not have resolution on exactly what the standards 1876 should evolve into, but 1,we do, I have clear direction from the board of commissioners that they 1877 want the centers that are in place now, if we get a subdivision application that meets them,they 1878 want that to be an administrative approval. 1879 1880 Venkat Yendapalli: Okay. And one other question I have is about the flow charts. Flow charts are very useful tool for 1881 applicants. And even when I was being trained by Perdita,and we were able to understand the 1882 process, so fast by looking at it just one glance, up and down the chart, you can tell,oh,what is 1883 the process to go through versus reading a lot of text. So, I think my suggestion or, I do not know 1884 about colleagues, but my suggestion is to have them in there, but again, it is just one person 1885 giving suggestion here about,about that particular change. 1886 1887 Cy Stober: I love flow charts. I like flow charts as well. I just want to reemphasize,and I would actually ask 1888 Taylor to chime in about their value in the application process in communicating, especially with 1889 applicants that are not used to our process. I am happy with flow charts, but they are a guidance 1890 material, and I want to really focus the ordinance on regulation, so I do not want to lose the flow 1891 charts. I just want to relocate them out of the ordinance. That is, that is the goal. 1892 1893 Venkat Yendapalli: Out of ordinance. Okay, they are still there. 1894 1895 Taylor Perschau: Exactly. We have a lot of outside resources that we use on a daily basis that are far more 1896 readable than what is available in the ordinance. 1897 1898 Venkat Yendapalli: Okay. Thank you. 1899 1900 Chris Johnston: Do you have any further questions? 1901 1902 Venkat Yendapalli: No. 1903 1904 Chris Johnston: All right,so I have a few questions. In regard to, so I understand that there is NIMs for rezoning, 1905 and also this is the subdivision side of things, correct? So this is,we are talking subdivision NIMs 1906 when we are talking about what is continuing going forward, correct? 1907 1908 Cy Stober: Yeah. We also have neighborhood information meetings for special use permits, and for 1909 government uses. 1910 1911 Chris Johnston: So. I guess my question is, are we required to alert the neighbors 1,000 feet from property for 1912 subdivision by right usages at all? 1913 1914 Cy Stober: No. 1915 1916 Chris Johnston: No. So my next question is, should we have those? Is it valuable to have those if our feelings are 1917 that the public does not necessarily have a say in regard to,we are putting on a neighborhood 1918 information meeting. You are going to come out and hear about our proposal, but by right we are 1919 allowed to do this, and you may get some level of concession if we feel generous about it, but 1920 there is not really any kind of leverage that the public has in that regard as well. Is there a 1921 purpose of keeping the names for this particular set of procedure if again the problem is that they