Browse
Search
PB Agenda Packet 6-3-26
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2026
>
PB Agenda Packet 6-3-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/5/2026 4:23:10 PM
Creation date
6/5/2026 4:17:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/3/2026
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
183
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
19 <br /> DRAFT <br /> 713 will move on. And then this is the Rigsbee plat that was just recommended for approval by this <br /> 714 board and is consistent with the zoning approval that it had before. And we have determined that <br /> 715 our subdivision review process applies in this case because it is conforming with the zoning <br /> 716 district. So,just a summary, and these are Taylor's slides. I am stealing them. Thank you. The <br /> 717 major subdivision is six to 20 lots if you are using the zoning lot minimums or 13 to 20 if you are <br /> 718 using the flexible design option. The minor subdivision is no more than five conventional lots or <br /> 719 no more than 12 flexible lots. And what are we proposing to change with this amendment <br /> 720 package? So,we are proposing to eliminate the concept plan from planning board review and <br /> 721 have that be presented at a neighborhood information meeting instead. We are proposing that the <br /> 722 preliminary plat and the final plat be able to be approved by the planning director, essentially the <br /> 723 planning staff. What would that look like in terms of review? So, this is the current review <br /> 724 approach. The amendments that are before you would change this so that the planning board <br /> 725 would be eliminated from reviewing the concept plan. We could invite you, and this was <br /> 726 discussed that as a matter of practice to the neighborhood meeting to be a part,to participate in <br /> 727 reviewing the concept plan and then remove both boards from reviewing the preliminary plat <br /> 728 provided it meets the standards of the Unified Development Ordinance. And then in the review <br /> 729 process, again,what would this look like? The changes would be that the planning staff would <br /> 730 accept the concept plan. It would be presented at the neighborhood information meeting so that <br /> 731 the public could have the opportunity to weigh in on what is being proposed and provide <br /> 732 constructive feedback. The preliminary plat, such as the Rigsbee one that was reviewed tonight, <br /> 733 would go through the planning staff as far as an application and then be presented at the <br /> 734 development advisory committee,which is the fire marshal planning staff, DOT, parks and <br /> 735 recreation, environmental health, and others,addressing, are all invited to participate and make <br /> 736 sure that the plat conforms with their standards, and then the final plat. And any change would be <br /> 737 reviewed and approved by the planning staff. And something that we are making clear with the <br /> 738 amendments is that all required permitting, so like say the road certification or any dedications for <br /> 739 amenities and so forth,would have to be permitted and approved or otherwise guaranteed. The <br /> 740 most common one of this is stormwater. We would require if the stormwater is a pond or device, <br /> 741 hopefully a device, a rain garden or a bio-retention cell has not been certified and finalized,we will <br /> 742 collect a bond for that, keep it on file at the county, and they will pay a premium on that bond until <br /> 743 they are able to complete that. We would have the leverage then to call that bond and complete <br /> 744 the work ourselves should they go bankrupt or should they walk on the project or something to <br /> 745 that effect and ruin their credit. I do not know why they would do that unless they are really in a <br /> 746 hard place, but we would have that ability. Same thing with road surfacing and landscaping. <br /> 747 Landscaping and stormwater bonds are the most common bonds that we hold at the county, but it <br /> 748 was a little unclear about the relationship with phased projects as well as how that surety is posted <br /> 749 to the county and its relationship to platting, and so the amendments try to clarify that too. <br /> 750 <br /> 751 Chris Johnston: Just to clarify. So, currently we do not hold a bond for the finishing of projects for like stormwater <br /> 752 and things of that nature? <br /> 753 <br /> 754 Cy Stober: No,we do. <br /> 755 <br /> 756 Chris Johnston: We do. <br /> 757 <br /> 758 Cy Stober: Yeah, but there is a lot of language that was about like what the HOA should do and how they <br /> 759 should hold the bond and how they should certify things, stuff that is none of our business. It is all <br /> 760 just advisory and getting us involved in HOA business,which is we do not need those headaches. <br /> 761 We do not need to be involved, and we are not, and we disregard those parts of the ordinance <br /> 762 because it is intrusive and well out of our legal purview to be involved in HOA matters. What we <br /> 763 need is when you construct a stormwater pond and you have not converted it yet, it is not ready to <br /> 764 treat stormwater, but you want to get the final permit on your final home,we say we need that <br /> 765 bond. We actually collect it far earlier than this, but we need that bond. It needs to cover 125 <br /> 766 percent of the cost of construction and 1 year of maintenance. If you cannot provide that,you do <br /> 767 not have a final house. You have not provided us with a guarantee that you can actually develop <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.