Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 08-20-2002
>
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2017 3:11:54 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:47:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/20/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20020820
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Issile Public Concerns Coinity Response/Actions <br /> Some wells in the area have already gone dry. The consideration for land use modification. <br /> residents wonder what options they have if these • Groundwater quantity can vary dramatically from place to place, <br /> additional 22 wells impact existing wells in the area. due to the type of fractured rock geology that underlies the surface. <br /> • Consistent with the variability of water resources, planning staff or <br /> environmental health cannot base their comments on anecdotal <br /> claims from neighbors. <br /> • There are presently no well quantity standards in the county. <br /> • County standards do require a specific distance between the well <br /> and septic system. <br /> • There is also a well water uali standard. <br /> 7. Sewer Septic System Functioning • Each lot shall contain an adequate area for septic disp7followed <br /> repair. <br /> The neighbors do not believe that this area would • The Orange County Division of Environmental Healt <br /> support 22 lots appropriate for septic field State requirements for septic system pre-approval. <br /> installation. • In this case all sites were approved for a 5 bedroom conventional <br /> system except one. <br /> • One lot was approved for a 3 bedroom conventional system. <br /> • See the attached prelimina site reviews. <br /> 8. Economics of Public Infrastructure Support • The fiscal impact studies that are run for residential projects show <br /> New that homes over $252,000 adequately provide revenue to cover <br /> The residents believe that Tuscany Ridge is not <br /> Development associated public services. <br /> paying enough fees to support the resulting public • Operating expenses due to capital improvements are not addressed <br /> burden created by the additional people in the area. the fiscal subdivision report. <br /> Local property owners believed the numbers used to • School impact fees cover approximately 60% of the actual cost. <br /> estimate average family size for the development • The study is based on the best available data from statistically valid <br /> were too low. <br /> reports. <br /> 9. Open • Tuscany Ridge plans include the preservation of 6 acres of common <br /> Space/Buffers area open space where the County requires none. <br /> • Walking trails are also being incorporated into the development. <br /> • Re wired roadside buffers are resent. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.