Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 08-20-2002
>
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2017 3:11:54 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:47:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/20/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20020820
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a� <br /> Orange County Board of Commissioners <br /> Page 3 <br /> August 15, 2002 <br /> flexible development technique which is now in place for the <br /> rest of the County' s planning jurisdiction can be put in place <br /> in the Rural Buffer so long as the minimum two acre lot size is <br /> not compromised. <br /> 2. Any Orange County ordinance amendments, both zoning <br /> and subdivision, which would have the effect of implementing <br /> flexible development in the Rural Buffer would have to be <br /> accomplished as prescribed in Section 2 . 6 of the Joint Planning <br /> Agreement. That is, the proposal, to the extent that it effects <br /> either the Chapel Hill joint development area or the Carrboro <br /> joint development area would have to be referred to Chapel Hill <br /> and Carrboro respectively for review and recommendation. The <br /> County would have to wait the shorter of 30 days or receipt of <br /> those recommendations before it could act. There is no joint <br /> approval required for any such amendments. So long as the <br /> proposed amendments did not require a land use plan amendment <br /> (and what is used here as an example, in my opinion, would not) <br /> and did not attempt to violate the Joint Planning Agreement, <br /> Orange County' s approval of the amendments to its land use <br /> regulations is all that is required. Furthermore, these <br /> amendments would not have to go through the Joint Planning Area <br /> public hearing process. Only Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan <br /> amendments, Chapel Hill or Carrboro zoning map amendments <br /> affecting the Transition Areas and text amendments to Carrboro <br /> and Chapel Hill' s land use regulations which are inconsistent <br /> with the adopted Joint Planning Area Land Use Plan are subject <br /> to a joint public hearing and joint approval. <br /> 3 . Presently the County' s regulations do not provide for <br /> neighborhood meetings or neighborhood notice for subdivisions in <br /> the Rural Buffer. And, as you know, Orange County does not <br /> conduct public hearings as part of its subdivision review <br /> process unless the subdivision is presented by the developer as <br /> a planned development under the Zoning Ordinance. If the <br /> subdivision is also a planned development there is a public <br /> hearing, part of the special use permit process. I can recall <br /> very few residential subdivisions being presented to Orange <br /> County as planned developments and only one, Churton Grove, <br /> having been approved. Typically the only time a developer <br /> chooses the planned development, special use process is where <br /> the developer is seeking greater density than the zoning <br /> regulations permit. The Subdivision Regulations can be amended <br /> to require neighborhood meetings and neighborhood notice in the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.