Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 6a
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 08-20-2002
>
Agenda - 08-20-2002 - 6a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2017 3:11:54 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:47:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/20/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6a
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20020820
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
board,good people of our own community,that they get up and send to the appropriate commissioners <br /> the strongest possible statement reflecting the opinions of these other home owners who are going to be in <br /> a bad spot because of this. Failing to the paving when the subdivision person when the developer should <br /> pay it,our well level situations are already starting to suffer because of the draught,no one has any idea <br /> when it will end,nor have any hydrologic studies been provided to the commissioners along with any of <br /> the other critical information that they should have heard earlier on.I would expect this group of people, <br /> you people,to make a very strong stand for what we are trying now to catch up to.We would appreciate <br /> any effort on your parts to be heard and heard loudly by these commissioners for the benefit of these <br /> homeowners. I thank you. I live at 1715 Borland Rd. close enough that this is going to effect me. <br /> John Potter:We moved to this area about 3 years ago now and we are directly behind the comer of this <br /> development behind here so we are adjacent to the property.We are bordering right on this property line. <br /> I think that is important,if most of the comments are being made are being made to the record,I think it is <br /> important to know that this is only 51 acres here.The original sale of this property is more to the tune of <br /> 117 acres.The way on this map here we all need to look here because it is part of the record,there is a <br /> road that leads up to just about the corner of our property.All those roads are open.This road continues <br /> we are sitting right back in here,this road is continued on at some point and this is where a balance of that <br /> property begins.I can imagine that there is going to be fiuther development if this is allowed to go <br /> through.And I think that is an important point. Let's not forget the other 50+acres that are sitting back in <br /> here and what is important about those 50 acres is that a big portion of that is landlocked. The only access <br /> to the additional property is through this development. There are two other points that are important. <br /> Directly next to us is a 10 acne piece of property that was sold two years ago and they did not find a perc <br /> site and had to move on down the road even to build a house. Secondly we have a 400+foot well that <br /> only develops about a gallon and a%a a minute. So,there are some real issues out there. Thank you. <br /> Bobbie Marshall: I primarily have a question.You were quick to point out before our time to talk that at <br /> this point there is nothing that the Planning board can do.My question after making phone calls since I <br /> found out about this is can somebody tell us what there is left that we can do. I don't know where to turn <br /> with this.We and other people have talked. We have a well that is 550 feet deep,it has already gone dry <br /> once because someone at the opposite end of the road put in a well.And ours was completely dry. Even <br /> though it is 550 feet deep we get 1 gallon a minute.That is without this additional development. So,if <br /> you can either give us information about where we can turn or what we can do or direct me to where we <br /> can find that information I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. <br /> Alice Dawson: 2902 Arthur Minnis Rd. I would just like to,kinda like she said,one of the things that is <br /> interesting about this process tonight is that the Phuming board and staff are here clearly to assist the <br /> developers. I don't mean inappropriately,but that is what you all are doing.Who is going to help us with <br /> this?Will you provide the same services and help to us as citizens and land owners in Orange County <br /> who have lived in and loved this area as you provided to these developers who are going to come in and <br /> destroy what we have all been trying to live for many years. <br /> Gooding-Ray: any discussion?I just want to know. My understanding is that we can prepare a resolution <br /> to the County commissioners or send a memo to them. Benedict,one thing that I would like for you to <br /> address or perhaps you could reiterate what you said before about the process that the County <br /> commissioners could go through so that you all can understand what your possible options are. If you <br /> can't hear please let us know. <br /> Benedict:I will refer this also to the County Attorney because the county attorney will be the one that will <br /> be recommending any actions to be taken by the commission which is where it lies at this point.Goof <br /> Gledhill, is the county Attorney. Based on tonight's discussion,based on the minutes of this meeting,we <br /> will forward all of this information to the County attorney. Any written letter that is not confidential to the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.