Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
5 Draft <br /> 1 provided via four ingress-egress points along New Jericho Road, similar to the 2015 master <br /> 2 plan and approval. The submitted application and evidence was reviewed by staff and was <br /> 3 determined to be complete per the requirements of Orange County UDO Sections 2.5,2.7, and <br /> 4 5.8.4.The applicant also submitted material evidence to support Orange County UDO submittal <br /> 5 requirements and use standards. Staff finds that the special use proposed will maintain or <br /> 6 promote the public health, safety, and general welfare if located where proposed and <br /> 7 developed and operated according to the site plan. Based on the materials provided, staff finds <br /> 8 no potential injury to the value of property. As documented in the staff report, staff finds the <br /> 9 use will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be located, and the use is compliant with <br /> 10 the plan for the physical development of the county. Based on Section 2.7.3 of the UDO, the <br /> 11 BOA may impose such reasonable conditions upon approval of the SUP. Here we have the <br /> 12 conditions which have been submitted by staff. Conditions 1 through 11 include the conditions <br /> 13 contained in the existing approved special-use permit from 2015, with minor edits for <br /> 14 consistency and compliance with existing UDO standards. Conditions 13 through 17 have been <br /> 15 submitted by the applicant for your review tonight. At this time, I'm going to allow for the <br /> 16 applicant to come up. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 Leon Meyers: Ashley, before you leave. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 Ashley Moncado: Yes. <br /> 21 <br /> 22 Leon Meyers: In the agenda package is something a little bit unusual, which is the 2017 SUP that was <br /> 23 recorded sometime in the last 3 months. Can you explain that circumstance? <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Ashley Moncado: Yep. So, when this process started and the applicant came in to do the revision, it was, with <br /> 26 staff's review, it was brought to our attention that the SUP that was approved in 2015 had <br /> 27 actually not been recorded.So,we did work with legal staff and our applicant so that we drafted <br /> 28 the SUP, and it had been recorded earlier this year. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Leon Meyers: So that's why we have a 2015 SUP with a 2025 recording date. <br /> 31 <br /> 32 Ashley Moncado: It's the SUP, yes, had not been drafted in 2015 and not been recorded, but we did go back <br /> 33 through all the board materials at that time. The 2015 SUP was presented to the BOCC. It <br /> 34 would have been a quarterly public hearing. So went back, reviewed all the materials, the <br /> 35 minutes to make sure that all the conditions, anything that was placed at that time, was <br /> 36 accounted for in the SUP that was recorded earlier this year. <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Leon Meyers: Thank you for that. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 Ashley Moncado: Yep. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 Leon Meyers: Board members, any questions for staff? <br /> 43 <br /> 44 Ashley Moncado: And also note as well, the site plan that is attached to that is the site plan that was presented <br /> 45 at the quarterly public hearing and approved by the BOCC at that time as well. <br /> 46 <br /> 47 Leon Meyers: Yeah. All right. All right, then for the applicant? <br /> 48 <br /> 49 Leann Brown: Good evening, board members. It's nice to see all of you this evening. My name is Leann <br /> 50 Brown, and I am here representing Waldorf Educational Association of NC, Inc., as its counsel. <br /> 5 <br />