Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-22-2003-2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 05-22-2003
>
Agenda - 05-22-2003-2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 8:27:25 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:47:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/22/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20030522
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chapel Hill -Carrboro City Schools <br />Lincoln Center, Merritt Mill Road <br />Chapel Hill, NC 27516 <br />Telephone: (919) 967-8211 <br />Fax: (919) 933-4560 <br />Neil Pedersen, Superintendent <br />Stephen ,A. Scroggs, Assistant <br />Superintendent for Support <br />Services <br />To: John Link, Manager <br />Orange County <br />From: Neil Pedersen, Superinte <br />Chapel Hill-Carrboro Ci Schools <br />Re: Responses to Manager's Concerns of Apri124, 2003 <br />Date: May 18, 2003 <br />I am providing the following responses to concerns you raised during the April 24, 2003 <br />County Commissioners meeting. Please feel free to contact me if further clarification is <br />needed. <br />Responses to the Manager's Concerns <br />1. "lt'Ixole Package" decision - s[te price slrouCd be in context of overall t~roject budget <br />The "Whole Package" concept is the basis for the proposed interlocal agreement that <br />the Board of County Commissioners will consider on May 20th. The School Board <br />has repeatedly taken the position that it is willing to move forward with this project <br />and will assume responsibility for any expenses that exceed the projected budget of <br />$33,870,000. If the cost exceeds this amount and then causes an overall budget <br />overrun, the School Board would expect to make adjustments in its CIP to cover this <br />condition. <br />2, Sriuare footage at upper end, cost ~rcee~Js, air~rored HS cotzstructirm standards <br />1~'llile the square footage is at the upper end of the ran~,~c and tl~c project costs do <br />exceed. the budgjet prescribed in the standards, it is important to note the reasons ~vhy. <br />I..anci costs in Chapel 1-11.11. clearly exceed. those i_r~ c}ther parts of'the cour~t~~. i_,and costs <br />exceeduig $30,Ot)0 per acre art common. Site preparation due to topography, rock, <br />environmental concerns and governTUeutal i°egulations are also 1ligher. Storm water <br />retention, I~CI_) conservation, and bio retention are examples of higher site costs in <br />Chapel Hill and Carrboro. L;xcess casts are entircl` attributable to site and site, <br />development costs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.