Browse
Search
PB Agenda Packet 5-6-26
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Orange County Planning Board
>
Agendas
>
2026
>
PB Agenda Packet 5-6-26
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/5/2026 5:37:11 PM
Creation date
5/5/2026 5:30:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/6/2026
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br /> 650 processing effluents, and so until we can talk about what areas are good for that, and <br /> 651 identifying those areas, not to say that that needs to be the county's responsibility, not to <br /> 652 say that we need to beg the state to do it, but there should be some sort of, I think, <br /> 653 conversation in between the two. And that's really where you can't move forward on <br /> 654 these systems and talk about the failure points without saying, like, if we don't know the <br /> 655 soils and we're not totally sure that these soils are going to take them on, that's the <br /> 656 concern, right? And with Fiddlehead, it was a conversation about, that's an unknown. <br /> 657 And in specifically that area of the county, it's known that there's not a lot of perc-ing. <br /> 658 There's known that you have to have much larger parcels with one building on it in order <br /> 659 to be successful. And so again, I'm lacking the jargon and the expertise for sure, but I do <br /> 660 know that that is the biggest thing that we can't just state out loud because it's the biggest <br /> 661 problem. <br /> 662 <br /> 663 Statler Gilfillen: This may be a little bit of a variance, but I believe the county zoning allows that if you have <br /> 664 a 3,000 square foot house on a 3-acre site, you are allowed to build an in-law apartment <br /> 665 on your property up to like 1,200, 1,500 square feet, or about half the size. Now, if that <br /> 666 house was built 10 years ago with the septic system on it, what are the provisions in this <br /> 667 system for adding that in-law apartment to the septic system? Are there any? <br /> 668 <br /> 669 Beth Bronson: Bedrooms. <br /> 670 <br /> 671 Tom Altieri: I'm going to turn to Cy on that one. <br /> 672 <br /> 673 Cy Stober: You need either an existing system permit to verify with environmental health that your <br /> 674 individual system can accommodate the additional bedrooms, or you would need to get <br /> 675 construction authorization to expand your system to accommodate the new building. <br /> 676 <br /> 677 Statler Gilfillen: So, that is covered? Okay. <br /> 678 <br /> 679 Cy Stober: Oh yeah, yeah. Vigilantly. <br /> 680 <br /> 681 Tom Altieri: So even for a home renovation, if someone were to add a bedroom, they would ensure <br /> 682 that not only the drain field, but the septic system, the septic tank were sized <br /> 683 appropriately. <br /> 684 <br /> 685 Statler Gilfillen: I went through this about 12 years ago, adding an addition to a 1914 farmhouse, and we <br /> 686 put a brand-new septic system in, and it was sized to accommodate an in-law apartment <br /> 687 that's never been added. Which may be the reason that that system has been very <br /> 688 efficient all these years. <br /> 689 <br /> 690 Charity Kirk: Okay, so off of what Beth was saying and her concern about this, is there any <br /> 691 consideration in the land-use plan about trying to develop out any of these nodes so that <br /> 692 they can support more of a community system that people then can hook into? So, like 1 <br /> 693 know where I'm from in California, there was a little town that was very proud that they <br /> 694 dealt with their own poop. They didn't necessarily deal with it well, but they did, and so <br /> 695 they built around their little private sewer system, and then they paid to kind of do that. <br /> 696 So, there was a community utility basically that then people could hook into, but that <br /> 697 would require—and they were in the county, so but that would require a certain amount of <br /> 698 us being willing to densify certain to allow more of a community system that people could <br /> 699 hook into. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.