Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-20-2003-8r
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 05-20-2003
>
Agenda - 05-20-2003-8r
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 9:10:20 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:46:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/20/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8r
Document Relationships
ORD-2003-030 Stream Classification Amendments
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Three common problems encountered include, but are not limited to, disputes as to whether a <br />USGS stream actually exists, disputes as to whether the location of :said USGS stream is as <br />shown on the map and disputes concerning whether the floodplain is properly mapped based <br />on the inaccurate location of a USGS stream. <br />The State's original decision to require the use of USGS maps at the time the watershed <br />protection rules were adopted was due to the fact that the USGS maps were available <br />throughout the state while better maps, such as the Soil Survey, were not. Orange County <br />adopted the USGS maps `by reference', as did other jurisdictions throughout the State. Due to <br />the `by reference' adoption of the USGS maps the County's ability to `relocate' the stream is not <br />available and the procedure for correcting an inaccurate stream location on a USGS map at the <br />Federal level is lengthy and expensive. Furthermore, the correction of one inaccurate stream <br />on a USGS map does not necessarily mean that inaccuracies for other streams on the same <br />map are corrected. There are better methods than the use of static maps to protect stream <br />quality and watersheds, the two most notable being DWQ certification of local governmental <br />personnel and delegated authority. <br />Orange County now has staff members trained in identifying surface water features that have a <br />direct impact on water quality. Prior to receiving delegated authority for enforcement of the <br />Neuse River Buffer rules from DWQ, each member of the Orange County Erosion Control staff <br />received 50 hours of field training and classroom testing under the Surface Water Identification <br />Training and Certification (SWITC) program. House Bill 1257 mandated the SWITC <br />certification program to be taught by DWQ staff. This training, which is intended to ensure the <br />enforcement of rules enacted by the N.C. Environmental Management Commission, is deemed <br />sufficient by DWQ for stream identification use and establishing buffers per state-mandated <br />watershed protection rules. The stream identification checklist that County staff uses to identify <br />streams was developed by DWQ. <br />This proposed amendment will allow usage of available, existing methods to protect streams by <br />broadening language in the zoning ordinance that would allow, in addition to the USGS maps, <br />the use of the Soil Survey of Orange County and field identification of water features by County <br />staff. By using these three methods of water feature identification in combination with each <br />other, virtually all streams that affect water quality will be protected. Another derived benefit is <br />that the availability of County staff to do field determinations of streams will provide a service to <br />property owners, more accurate and without cost, that will help them maintain a high quality of <br />stream preservation. <br />Maps showing the difference between the USGS maps and Soil Survey will be presented at the <br />Planning Board meeting. While the new GIS maps are being updated with the soil survey <br />streams, staff will use the soil survey maps as they currently are for Neuse River Buffer Rules. <br />Issues at the Public Hearing (February 24, 2003) <br />• Question regarding these amendments and applicability to Bona Fide Farming activities <br />• Zoning does not apply to bona fide farming activities per State Statutes. Forestry <br />activities are also exempt to the extent they fall under the same bona fide farming <br />provision. However, if a portion of a farm exempt tract were proposed for <br />development in the future (e.g. subdivision, non farm-related home occupation, etc), <br />zoning ordinance provisions, which include stream buffers, would apply to the <br />development proposal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.