Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-20-2003-8r
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 05-20-2003
>
Agenda - 05-20-2003-8r
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 9:10:20 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:46:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/20/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8r
Document Relationships
ORD-2003-030 Stream Classification Amendments
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2000-2009\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
16 <br />MINUTES <br />ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br />APRIL 2, 2003 <br />ORDINANCE REVIEW 6:00-7:30 P.M. <br />ORDINANCE REVIEW MEMBERS PRESENT : Nicole Gooding-Ray, Chapel Hill at Large; Hunter <br />Schofield, Cedar Grove Representative <br />PLANNING BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: Jay Bryan, Chapel Hill at Large; Craufurd Goodwin, <br />Hillsborough Representative; Dr. Barry Katz, Chapel Hill at Large; Rachel Preston, Eno <br />Representative; Noah Ranells, Bingham at Large; Theodore Triebel, Little River Representative <br />STAFF PRESENT (ORDINANCE REVIEW): Craig Benedict, Orange County Planning Director; <br />Robert Davis, Current Planning Supervisor, Planner III; Tom Altieri, Comprehensive Planning <br />Supervisor, Planner III; David Lentzer, Planner II; Carla Thames, Planner I; Tom King, Planner II <br />AGENDA ITEM #1: APPROVAL OF MINUTES <br />a. December 18, 2002 -Ordinance Review <br />MOTION was made by Hunter Schofield to accept the minutes. Seconded by Nicole Gooding- <br />Ray. <br />VOTE: Consensus <br />AGENDA ITEM #2: ITEMS HEARD AT THE FEBRUARY 24, 2003 PUBLIC HEARING <br />a. Outdoor Lighting Standards Text Amendments <br />Presenter: Carla Thames <br />PURPOSE: To provide a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners regarding <br />Outdoor Lighting Standards. <br />BACKGROUND: <br />Presently, the Orange County Zoning Ordinance does not have any oul:door lighting standards for <br />new or existing development. Generally, the lighting information that the County reviews has <br />been submitted as part of the site plan approval, limiting oversight to those projects requesting a <br />construction authorization. As development and population numbers increase in the County an <br />effective lighting standards ordinance that reflects community values c;an be an important <br />component in helping to maintain a high quality of life. <br />On occasion, the Planning Department receives complaints that specific lights exceed the <br />brightness necessary to accomplish a particular task. Without clear standards, enforcement <br />action is limited. In these cases, persuasion is the chief enforcement tool and generally has a low <br />rate of success. <br />More recently, there have been concerns about the general loss of darkness during the nighttime <br />hours. `Light Pollution', the common term for sky glow, adversely affects astronomical <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.