Orange County NC Website
MINUTES <br /> ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH <br /> February 25, 2026 <br /> • In response to Mr. Whitaker, Ms. Quatrone confirmed that the cost of things like facilities, <br /> building renovations, and utilities do not come out of the Health Department budget but <br /> through other county funding. However, the cost of things like equipment replacements <br /> do come from the Health Department budget. <br /> • Mr. Perschau reviewed the proposed fee changes by division. Mr. Whitaker asked about <br /> fees listed as "at acquisition cost", which Ms. Stewart confirmed means that the fee <br /> charged to the client cannot exceed the cost to the Health Department to purchase the <br /> item. Most common item for this criterion are the 340B drugs. <br /> • Commissioner McKee noted that he is planning to call for a 2% countywide budget cut <br /> and so the budget as presented may need to be cut further in the future. Ms. Stewart <br /> clarified that the task for this meeting is for the Board to pass a budget request asking for <br /> what the Health Department needs for FY26-27 and that modifications would be <br /> coordinated between the Health Department, the County Manager's Office, Budget <br /> Office and the BOCC. She added that she will be completing a worksheet to determine <br /> what Health Department functions are truly mandated and what may be able to be cut to <br /> help meet the shortfall. <br /> A motion to approve the total budget requested in the amount of$10,734,044 for FY 2026- <br /> 2027 as presented, and forward to the County Manager and Board of County <br /> Commissioners for action was made by Dr. Alison Stuebe, was seconded by Dr. Lee <br /> Pickett, and carried without dissent. <br /> A motion to approve all fee changes for FY 2026-2027 as presented, and forward to the <br /> Board of County Commissioners for action was made by Dr. Lee Pickett, was seconded <br /> by Dr. Aparna Jonnal, and carried without dissent. <br /> B. Resolution on Newborn Screening for Metachromatic Leukodystrophy and Duchenne's <br /> Muscular Dystrophy <br /> Jean Phillips-Weiner, Board of Health Strategic Plan Manager, presented a draft resolution <br /> advocating for the inclusion of Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) and Duchenne Muscular <br /> Dystrophy (DMD) on the North Carolina Newborn Screening Panel. Some highlights of her <br /> presentation are below: <br /> • At the January meeting, Vrinda from the nonprofit Youth for Rare Diseases presented <br /> about the importance of adding MLD and DMD to the North Carolina Newborn Screening <br /> Panel, and she has since helped draft this resolution for the Board's consideration. The <br /> hope is for local lawmakers to encourage state law and policymakers to amend the NC <br /> Newborn Screening Panel to include MLD and DMD. <br /> • MLD is a neurodegenerative disorder and DMD is a progressive muscular wasting <br /> disorder. Both are inherited, both have effective screening tests and gene therapy <br /> treatments, and in both cases, time lost on diagnosis means function lost for the <br /> individual with the condition and that, once lost, the function cannot be regained. <br /> • Though MLD and DMD were added to the Federal Recommended Uniform Screening <br /> Panel (RUSP) at the end of 2025, this is no guarantee that the conditions will be added <br /> to the North Carolina panel in a timely manner; in the past, the condition Pompe was <br /> added to the NC Newborn Screening Panel fifteen years after it was added to the RUSP. <br /> • North Carolina already has screening infrastructure in place to screen for DMD, as well <br /> as scientific expertise at Duke and UNC, posing them to be a leader in newborn <br /> screening for MLD and DMD. <br /> S:\Managers Working Files\BOH\Agendas &Abstracts\2026 Agenda and Abstracts\ <br /> February Page 5 <br />