Browse
Search
Approved Minutes of February 25, 2026
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Health
>
Minutes
>
2026
>
Approved Minutes of February 25, 2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/16/2026 7:30:23 PM
Creation date
4/16/2026 7:28:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/25/2026
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
Document Relationships
Approved Agenda February 25, 2026
(Attachment)
Path:
\Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active\Board of Health\Agendas\2026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br /> ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF HEALTH <br /> February 25, 2026 <br /> • The Orange County Government is working to standardize fees countywide, and all fees <br /> are ultimately approved by the BOCC. Mr. Perschau reminded the Board that it is the <br /> final year of the Dental Divisions stepwise fee increases, after which the fees should be <br /> in line with national standards. <br /> • Mr. Perschau clarified that the budget request is based on the net of the total authorized <br /> expenditures minus the service revenue. For FY25-26, this worked out to be about <br /> $10.1 M, with $14.35M in authorized expenditures and $4.193M in revenue streams. <br /> • Mr. Perschau reviewed the timeline for the annual budget process and reminded the <br /> Board that the FY26-27 budget will be formally adopted by the BOCC in June. <br /> • Because of ongoing budget cuts and uncertainty, the goal for this year's Health <br /> Department budget is to remain "flat"—that is, to minimize any new expenditures without <br /> corresponding new revenue. Mr. Perschau clarified that personnel and capital <br /> expenditures are considered separate processes to the main budget process. <br /> • At Mr. Whitaker's request, Mr. Perschau shared several assumptions that are relevant to <br /> the budget request, including an ongoing lack of a state budget and projected service <br /> revenue amounts for FY26-27. <br /> • Mr. Perschau highlighted the Public Health Infrastructure Local Workforce Development <br /> funding and said that it is similar to American Rescue Plan act (ARPA) funding in that it <br /> can be used for workforce development such as training, consulting, and conferences <br /> without needing county funds. Ms. Stewart shared that Local Workforce Development <br /> funds were used to pay for consulting services from the Carden Group last year. <br /> • Mr. Perschau shared that the Health Department is working with a team of consulting <br /> graduate students to improve the clinic's front desk and billing operations, as well as that <br /> Travis Myren, County Manager, has tapped the Orange County Health Department for <br /> an audit to assess staffing needs and operational efficiency. This audit will consist of an <br /> outside vendor coming in to examine staffing needs, scheduling, and operations to <br /> ensure staffing is adequate based on service levels. Ms. Stewart explained that the <br /> county government is trying to audit one department per year, with last year being <br /> focused on the Sheriff's Office. In response to Dr. Jonnal's question, Erica Pettigrew, <br /> Medical Director, commented that she is feeling hopeful that the results of the audit will <br /> be positive. <br /> • There has been a net operating expense decrease of$47,465 due to operational <br /> optimization and increased efficiency, leading to an overall net operating decrease of <br /> $8K. In response to Dr. Crandell's question, Kim Quatrone, Business Officer II, said that <br /> the projected personnel cost of the Health Department for FY26-27 is $13.1 M, which is <br /> higher than the total budget request (which excludes personnel costs. <br /> • Mr. Perschau reviewed the Medicaid Cost Settlement process, in which previously <br /> provided Medicaid services are partially reimbursed by the state, and reminded the <br /> Board that any funds received in the Cost Settlement process must be used in the <br /> program in which they were originally generated. There is currently a fund with a balance <br /> of$11.31M across all divisions, and this fund has so far generated $529K in interest <br /> revenue. In response to Commissioner McKee's question, Ms. Stewart explained that <br /> the interest revenue account is new and is not yet earmarked for anything specifically <br /> but that it still must be used to support the program where the funds were originally <br /> generated. She added that the Health Department is prepared to use some of these <br /> funds to help cover shortfall expenses where possible or to support additional positions if <br /> it is determined in the upcoming audit that these are needed. Ms. Quatrone added that a <br /> certain amount of funding must be allotted to certain programs to meet requirements to <br /> receive state funding, and Commissioner McKee expressed concern that the state funds <br /> may not come through regardless. <br /> S:\Managers Working Files\BOH\Agendas &Abstracts\2026 Agenda and Abstracts\ <br /> February Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.