Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
19 <br /> 1 Slide #8 <br /> GOTRIANGLE REQUEST #2: ROUTE 800 <br /> ■ Durham considered and did not approve, twice <br /> ■ Manager's Recommendation: This is a jointly funded expansion project between <br /> Orange and Durham Counties. Durham has rejected this amendment, and the <br /> County Manager cannot justify a one-sided increase without the partnership with <br /> Durham. <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Sarah Williamson said that GoTriangle has shared additional information about this <br /> 4 funding request since the Board's agenda packet was published. The new information states that <br /> 5 in FY25 the cost share for route 800 was 74% GoTriangle, 13% Durham Transit Plan and 13% <br /> 6 Orange Transit Plan, and the cost increase being considered is for expanding service. She said <br /> 7 that Staff recommend the Board reject this amendment to the annual work plan and ask the SWG <br /> 8 to consider maintaining the current level of service in the FY27 Annual Work Plan, not increasing <br /> 9 the service as proposed in the FY26 Q2 amendment, and additionally, that the SWG evaluate <br /> 10 route modifications and ridership levels as part of the Annual Work Plan process. <br /> 11 <br /> 12 Slide #9 <br /> CHAPEL HILLTRANSIT REQUESTS <br /> . Amendment to Existing Project <br /> 2. Converting Operating to Capital <br /> ■ Chapel Hill requests to withdrawal the amendments <br /> ■ Manager's Recommendation:Although Chapel Hill Transit has requested to withdraw <br /> this amendment given more current information about the NSBRT,the Board must <br /> reject the amendments as a procedural matter for the Staff Working Group to clean <br /> up the amendment package originally sent to the BOCC for approval. <br /> 13 <br />