Browse
Search
Agenda 03-17-2026; 8-a - Minutes for February 17, 2026 Business Meeting
OrangeCountyNC
>
BOCC Archives
>
Agendas
>
Agendas
>
2026
>
Agenda - 03-17-2026 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 03-17-2026; 8-a - Minutes for February 17, 2026 Business Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2026 1:42:58 PM
Creation date
3/12/2026 11:58:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/17/2026
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for March 17, 2026 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\BOCC Archives\Agendas\Agendas\2026\Agenda - 03-17-2026 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
28 <br /> 1 Vice-Chair Fowler noted that the program website says there may be exceptions is a <br /> 2 member of the household is 70 or older or has a disability. She asked if these exceptions were <br /> 3 utilized this year. <br /> 4 Blake Rosser said yes. He said he will follow up with those statistics if it was listed on the <br /> 5 application. <br /> 6 Commissioner Bedford said the length of homeownership requirements was decreased to <br /> 7 5 years to account for cases when family members inherit properties. <br /> 8 Blake Rosser agreed that community members have used that example as a point of <br /> 9 concern when mentioning decreasing the length of homeownership. <br /> 10 Commissioner McKee said he supports this program and increasing the availability of it. <br /> 11 He questioned if 5 years of homeownership was long enough to be considered "long-term". He <br /> 12 advocated for a 10-20 year minimum to better target those most likely to face displacement. He <br /> 13 also raised an issue with residents with higher home values qualifying for the program but <br /> 14 recognized that the revaluation increased values drastically. He also agreed with adding <br /> 15 exceptions for inherited properties, but said he wanted the program to serve those who need it <br /> 16 most, like those making 30-50%AMI. Chair Hamilton said it sounds like time should be <br /> 17 carved out for the Board to have more discussion on this and for them to get a refresher on why <br /> 18 the eligibility requirements for the program were initially decided. She emphasized the need for <br /> 19 stability in program rules, noting the importance of consistency for recipients who rely on annual <br /> 20 assistance. She also highlighted the need to consider how changes might affect younger families <br /> 21 with children, which the county needs to attract and retain. <br /> 22 Commissioner Portie-Ascott noted that 2% is subtracted based on household income. She <br /> 23 asked if that is still appropriate when thinking about people on a fixed income. <br /> 24 Blake Rosser explained that the award would stay higher for people on a fixed income by <br /> 25 using a standard percentage. <br /> 26 Commissioner Carter expressed appreciation for the Board's decision to expand the <br /> 27 program to the point that it is now. She agreed with Chair Hamilton's suggestion for this to be a <br /> 28 work session topic for additional discussion. <br /> 29 Commissioner McKee said he has mentioned freezing taxes for homeowners who are 65 <br /> 30 or older and have low incomes in the past. He said he's followed the discussion on property taxes <br /> 31 at the state-level but has no confidence North Carolina will follow others in doing that. He said he <br /> 32 wants to build something into this program that would freeze taxes for residents who are 65 years <br /> 33 old and meet the other necessary criteria. <br /> 34 Chair Hamilton reiterated the need for a work session discussion. <br /> 35 Blake Rosser said the Housing Department and Tax Office will meet in March to debrief <br /> 36 and come up with other suggestions and ideas for the Board to consider. <br /> 37 Commissioner Bedford asked staff to also look at how Durham and Mecklenburg have <br /> 38 adjusted their similar programs. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 b. Animal Services' History and Presentation on Current Services and the Community <br /> 41 Animal Clinic <br /> 42 The Board received information on Animal Services' history and received a presentation on <br /> 43 current services and an overview of the new Community Animal Clinic. <br /> 44 <br /> 45 BACKGROUND: Orange County Animal Services began in 1953 with a single dog warden and <br /> 46 a focus on rabies control. At that time, there was no adoption program, no volunteer program, and <br /> 47 no focus on animal welfare. Over time, as concerns with animal welfare gained traction and canine <br /> 48 variant rabies was eradicated, animal services priorities shifted to an increased focus on animal <br /> 49 care and placement. An adoption program was created, and finding homes for pets became a <br /> 50 central focus of sheltering. <br /> 51 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.