Orange County NC Website
54 <br /> Final Recommendations <br /> • Because CSD is not explicitly discussed in the 2030 Comp Plan, the 2050 Plan <br /> needs to include it, for the Rural Area and the Rural Buffer. <br /> • In the meantime, a guidance document to support this approach would be very <br /> helpful, besides updating the UDO. <br /> Summary <br /> • CSD protects more land than Flexible Subdivisions, Can be designed to <br /> minimize farmland loss, Can utilize various wastewater options, Is compatible <br /> with"Attainable Housing", and Is very applicable to the Rural Buffer. <br /> • Recommendation: *** ensure that affordable units blend with market rate units <br /> is to require that they often share the same two, three or four family building <br /> Question from Carter <br /> • Question: laid out the four steps in the design process.Where are those four <br /> steps embedded in the planning process? Plan, UDO? <br /> o Can allude to them in the comp plan. But specifics are always in the UDO. <br /> o NC model ordinance for conservation design - randall sent to staff. <br /> • Open space requirement-plan? UDO? <br /> o Doesn't hurt to include in guidance document. But what really counts is the <br /> ordinance language <br /> • Agricultural management- how does that work and how does that work in terms of <br /> management and ownership? <br /> o County planning in PA and NY its advisory, Ohio west its regulatory <br /> o MD its regulatory? <br /> o Lower Mayfield township farming corporation- bucks county, PA, advisory <br /> ■ Township had rules <br /> ■ Township put ordinance-owner of open space maybe abcde <br /> options, probably didn't even think of a farmland corporation <br /> ■ Not one individual owner- kind of like a co0op <br /> o Most examples are owned and managed by HOAs <br /> ■ should be a permanent easement on that plan <br />