Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
15 <br /> 1 SUMMARY NOTES <br /> 2 ORANGE COUNTY PLANNING BOARD <br /> 3 FEBRUARY 4,2026 <br /> 4 ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE <br /> 5 <br /> 6 <br /> 7 NOTE: A QUORUM IS NOT REQUIRED FOR ORDINANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETINGS. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 MEMBERS PRESENT: Lamar Proctor(Chair) Cheeks Township, Chris Johnston (Vice-Chair) Hillsborough Township, <br /> 10 Statler Gilfillen, Eno Township Representative; Meg Millard, Little River Township Representative; Venkat Yendapalli, <br /> 11 Cedar Grove Township Representative; Jonah Garson,At-Large Representative;Whitney Watson,At-Large <br /> 12 Representative; Delores Bailey,At-Large Representative; Charity Kirk,At-Large Representative. <br /> 13 <br /> 14 STAFF PRESENT: Cy Stober, Planning & Inspections Director; Perdita Holtz, Deputy Director—Long Range Planning <br /> 15 &Administration;Taylor Perschau, Current Planning Manager; Jack Moran, Planner 1 <br /> 16 <br /> 17 AGENDA ITEM 1: CALL TO ORDER <br /> 18 Meeting began at 7:21 PM. <br /> 19 <br /> 20 AGENDA ITEM 2: UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE(UDO)TEXT AMENDMENT—SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS-To <br /> 21 review Planning Director-initiated amendments to the LIDO pertaining to subdivision review processes and <br /> 22 classifications. <br /> 23 PRESENTER: Cy Stober, Planning & Inspections Director <br /> 24 <br /> 25 Cy Stober gave a presentation on the proposed UDO text amendments. <br /> 26 <br /> 27 The board reviewed previously proposed text amendments and how they relate to the new proposed package. <br /> 28 <br /> 29 The board discussed their role in the subdivision approval process,weighing the importance of public involvement. <br /> 30 <br /> 31 The board discussed the current subdivision ordinance and how it applied to development within the county, <br /> 32 specifically section 7.2.3 in relation to multiple subdivisions from a single parent tract. <br /> 33 <br /> 34 The board discussed potentially changing the lot threshold which would trigger Planning Board involvement and <br /> 35 review, specifically whether the Board should review more or fewer subdivision applications. <br /> 36 <br /> 37 The board requested clarity from planning staff regarding public notification and neighborhood information meetings <br /> 38 within the subdivision approval process. <br /> 39 <br /> 40 The board requested a review of the approved major subdivisions from the previous five years. <br /> 41 <br /> 42 The board reviewed the associated proposed changes to articles 2 and 3 of the Orange County LIDO <br /> 43 <br /> 44 AGENDA ITEM 4: ADJOURNMENT <br /> 45 The meeting adjourned at 9:21 PM. <br /> 46 <br />