Browse
Search
Agenda 03-05-2026; 8-a - Minutes for February 3, 2026 Business Meeting and February 10, 2026 Work Session
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2026
>
Agenda - 03-05-2026 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 03-05-2026; 8-a - Minutes for February 3, 2026 Business Meeting and February 10, 2026 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2026 3:31:20 PM
Creation date
2/26/2026 3:33:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/5/2026
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for March 5, 2026 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2026\Agenda - 03-05-2026 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br /> 1 Slide #5 <br /> SCHOOL STAFF SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS <br /> • Article 4 i sections d & e — Change language <br /> from "approval" to "appropriation" to clarify that <br /> budgetary approval for projects constitutes <br /> board approval. <br /> • Article 4 iii — Change payment timing to as <br /> agreed by School Board, as design contract <br /> are paid at milestones, not all at once. <br /> • Article 4 v — Change requirement for CMAR to <br /> recommendation. Bond projects can include <br /> smaller projects that don't use CMAR, and <br /> School attorney contends not statutorily <br /> allowed to delegate approval to County. <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> NORTH CAROLINA <br /> 2 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Slide #6 <br /> SCHOOL STAFF SUGGESTED AMENDMENTS <br /> GS 143-128.1 (e) <br /> Construction management at risk services may be used <br /> by the public entity only after the public entity has <br /> concluded that construction management at risk <br /> services is in the best interest of the project, and the <br /> public entity has compared the advantages and <br /> disadvantages of using the construction management <br /> at risk method for a given project in lieu of the <br /> delivery methods identified in G.S. 143-128(al)(1) <br /> through G.S. 143-128(al)(3). The public entity may <br /> not delegate this determination. (2001-496, s. 2; <br /> 2013-401, s. 5; 2014-42, s. 2.) <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> NORTH CAROLINA <br /> 5 <br /> 6 Kirk Vaughn explained that the statute detailed on this slide is the basis for the school's <br /> 7 attorney's concerns about the CMAR. <br /> 8 <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.