Browse
Search
Agenda 03-05-2026; 4-b - Final Report on Neighborhood Reviews and Revaluation Appeals
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2026
>
Agenda - 03-05-2026 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 03-05-2026; 4-b - Final Report on Neighborhood Reviews and Revaluation Appeals
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2026 3:30:38 PM
Creation date
2/26/2026 3:33:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
3/5/2026
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
4-b
Document Relationships
Agenda for March 5, 2026 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2026\Agenda - 03-05-2026 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
163 <br /> Orange County <br /> Summary Report <br /> 2025 Reappraisal Findings and Recommendations <br /> By working through the Vertical Inequity Project these past few months, <br /> there were several items of interest that may need to be revisited when <br /> preparing for the next reappraisal. As with any reappraisal, planning is most <br /> important especially when considering what goals and task will be targeted <br /> and amount of manpower and time needed to accomplish an accurate and <br /> thorough reappraisal. Also, when discussing my recommendations, I realize <br /> there may be differing opinions as to how a reappraisal is conducted and the <br /> methodology used, so take this simply as my recommendation to consider <br /> when preparing for the next reappraisal. <br /> One of the most important tasks in the early stages is to analyze all sales to <br /> make sure the property data and characteristics accurately match the <br /> property at time of sale. For example, properties that may be completely <br /> renovated may still be listed as average condition when compared to the <br /> actual age of the property, or the property could have either more or less <br /> actual square footage of finished area than compared to the property in the <br /> records. Since we analyze the small percentage of sold properties within a <br /> jurisdiction to appropriately assess all the remaining unsold properties, <br /> unless this sales verification process is completed correctly, modeling will be <br /> flawed and correct assessments will not occur. I also caution against the <br /> practice of sales chasing*, this gives a false reading of proper assessments <br /> but will cause many issues going forward, especially in regard to equity. We <br /> will discuss the model later, but for illustration purposes, the important point <br /> being that if your property data matches the sold property and there is a <br /> significant difference between the sales price and the assessed value, then <br /> the model should be re-examined. If this model does not reflect market <br /> value, then all properties would tend to need adjustments rather than just <br /> the sold property. *["Sales chasing" generally refers to changing the subjective <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.