Orange County NC Website
Docusign Envelope ID:41A5CO43-OEBB-4B4B-BB6A-9411707F7CAF <br /> including the 2021 sale of nearby Eastgate,which although earlier in time of sale is included to <br /> show the strength of location for a shopping center in this high barrier to entry market. <br /> • From the County's analysis,the appeal is unsupported and no change in value is recommended. <br /> • GIS Map of Subject <br /> • Current Property Record Card(8 pages) <br /> • Comparable Sales and Income Approach <br /> Motion of the Board No Change in Assessed Value $21,769,500 <br /> Made the motion Shannon Julian <br /> Seconded the motion Richal Vanhook <br /> Voted For All BOER Members <br /> Voted Against ... <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner Chapel Hill Foundation Appellant(if different) Morgan Fowler/Ryan, <br /> RE Holdings Inc. LLC <br /> Property Address 143 W. Franklin Street Parcel ID or Abstract 9788268572.006 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on an income approach based on actual income <br /> and market proforma. <br /> Current Assessed Value $24,446,700 ounty Opinion $18,360,200 <br /> Time of Hearin 3:16 PM Appellant Opinion $11,180,000 <br /> County Representative Roger Gunn Board Decision $18,360,200 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • The appellant is requesting a lower valuation based on an income approach that is based on <br /> actual income and market proforma. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • The subject is a set of retail condos located on the ground floor of the larger Carolina Square <br /> project in downtown Chapel Hill. The appellant utilizes a square footage of 46,022 square feet, <br /> while tax records list a total of 73,705 finished square feet. The appellant has requested a value <br /> of$11,180,000 or approximately$243 per square foot based on their square footage figure. <br /> • Based on the rent roll provided by the appellant, the subject's average lease rate appears to lag <br /> market rates primarily due to the large space occupied by the anchor tenant, Target. Larger <br /> retailers such as this, occupying large retail spaces tend to have lease rates lower than the <br /> average, as they occupy a much larger than average space. This appears to be reasonable and <br /> an average lease rate of$24.25 per square foot per year has been utilized for the purpose of this <br /> analysis. <br /> • Average vacancy rates for retail space in Orange County is significantly lower than the 10% <br /> used by the appellant. As the current rent roll only provides a snapshot of the current vacancy, <br /> a rate of 5%is used,which is somewhat closer to the sub-market average. It is also worth <br /> noting that this property has good parking. Additionally, 5%management and reserves <br /> 11 <br />