Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-29-2003-2
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 04-29-2003
>
Agenda - 04-29-2003-2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 12:39:28 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:46:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/29/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
2
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20030429
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.ieds ,Assessment Report <br />Orange County [~mcrgenc~~ l~~lanagement <br />June 12`x', 7002 <br />Our opinion of probable cost for the short-term recommendations described herein is: <br />Estimate <br />Set up and test backup transfer of 911 line to UNC-CH $300.00 per line x 7 <br />Multi-channel UHF backup repeater <br />Multi-channel VHF backup repeater <br />VIIF and UHF backup control stations <br />Restore voting equipment to proper operation <br />Eno Mountain Grounding and surge protection <br />Emergency Management Grounding and surge protection <br />Shift Supervisor training for communications bus setup <br />Carrboro Grounding and surge protection <br />Chapel Hill Grounding and surge protection <br />Enable Carrboro Public Works tone squelch <br />Chapel Hill fire ground LTHF license and radio programming <br />Conclusions & Recommendations <br />23,500.00 <br />23,500.00 <br />52,000.00 <br />1,000.00 <br />25,700.00 <br />25,700.00 <br />Internal to County <br />25,700.00 <br />25,700.00 <br />labor only <br />2,500.00 <br />CTA Communications recommends that in the County and its communities proceed with <br />plans to develop an integrated communications system using trunked radio technology. <br />The most cost-effective approach will be to purchase and install the entire system at one <br />time. Such a system will provide the capacity, coverage, reliability, and advanced <br />technology features to meet both the present and the future needs of the County and its <br />communities well into the 21S` Century. <br />We recognize that there are many factors involved in these decisions which are not <br />technical in nature, such as budgets, procurement regulations and funding availability, <br />that are beyond the scope of this study. What we do recommend, however, is that <br />regardless of which option is chosen, awell-defined Specification be developed that <br />includes minimum requirements for reliability, dependability, functionality and <br />maintainability. This should include performance objectives for functionality, <br />interference protection, radio coverage, as well as requirements for an Acceptance Test <br />Plan to insure that the selected vendor meets the system objectives, and that the system <br />meets the County's needs. <br />,~~„~" executive Snmmarl~ <br />~~ V I <br />~.. <br />COR~MUP~IICATIONS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.