Orange County NC Website
12 <br /> 1 Slide #14 <br /> AAT <br /> ` Orange County,North Carolina <br /> Management Letter Comments (Recommendations) <br /> • Accounting for Special Revenue Funds <br /> During our review of the County's financial statements,we noted the DSS Payee Fund did not have any revenue or expenditure <br /> activity(outside of a journal entry writing off liabilities)for the fiscal year under audit. Based on our review of the general <br /> ledger activity,it appears the County is still accounting for this fund as If it was still a custodial fund of the County where all <br /> amounts are received as cash and offset with a corresponding liability. With the change in accounting standard that was <br /> brought about by GASB Statement No.84,Fiduciary Activities,this fund was reclassified to a special revenue fund in previous <br /> years and should be reflecting the inflows it receives during the fiscal year as revenues and conversely,the outflows as <br /> expenditures. Due to the fact that the activity for the fiscal year ended June 30,2025,was not material,an audit adjustment to <br /> reclassify the activity was not required. However,we recommend County staff implement additional internal controls or <br /> additional annual closeout procedures to the ensure the amounts are properly recorded in accordance with generally accepted <br /> accounting principles(GAAP). <br /> • Lack of Annual Budget Adoption-Special Revenue Fund <br /> During our audit,we noted that the County did not adopt an annual budget for one of its Special Revenue Funds for the fiscal <br /> year ended June 30,2025. North Carolina General Statutes and the County's budgetary policies require that all funds subject to <br /> budgetary control have a formally adopted annual budget.Without an adopted budget,expenditures and revenues in the <br /> Special Revenue Fund were not subject to formal budgetary control, increasing the risk of unauthorized spending and <br /> noncompliance with state law and County policies. We recommend that management ensure all Special Revenue Funds are <br /> reviewed annually during the budget process and that an adopted budget ordinance is approved for each fund,regardless of <br /> the activity level. <br /> Auditor's Discussion&Analysis(AD&A) <br /> June 30,2025 <br /> 2 <br /> 3 Vice-Chair Fowler asked about concerns of the failure to adopt a DSS budget and <br /> 4 insufficient internal controls, and absence of formal budgetary oversight. She asked for more <br /> 5 detail on how the DSS Payee Fund should be managed. <br /> 6 Tim Lyons said that these types of funds used to be called agency funds, and that's how <br /> 7 every county government in North Carolina accounted for DSS payee funds. He said GASB 84 <br /> 8 changed the definition of what are now known as custodial funds and the payee funds does not <br /> 9 meet the definition of a custodial fund. He said now the DSS Payee Fund is considered a Special <br /> 10 Revenue Fund, and it reports an income statement. He said the difference is how it's set up in <br /> 11 the general ledger system with cash flowing in and going to a liability account, then the cash gets <br /> 12 paid out of the account. He said that activity must be reclassed to an income statement. He said <br /> 13 the accounting system is doing one thing and then manual adjustments must be made. He said <br /> 14 it would be better to have it accounted for in the accounting system rather than relying on manual <br /> 15 processes. <br /> 16 Vice-Chair Fowler asked if DSS has fixed the issue. <br /> 17 Tim Lyons said no, not to his knowledge. <br /> 18 Chair Hamilton asked what the definition is of a custodial fund vs. a special revenue fund. <br /> 19 Tim Lyons said there are a couple of accounting standards within the GASB literature that <br /> 20 defines what a special revenue fund is. He said special revenue funds at a minimum must have <br /> 21 a revenue stream that is restricted for a purpose. He said there are a lot of things that go into what <br /> 22 can and cannot be a custodial fund. He said there are several significant elements that GASB <br /> 23 lays out about control and who the beneficiary of the fund is and if it is outside of the government. <br /> 24 He said they question if the activity of the fund is being derived from the government's sole source <br /> 25 revenues. He said there are a lot of criteria of what can and cannot be a custodial fund. He said <br /> 26 when GASB 84 came out, the LGC said DSS Payee Funds do not meet the definition of a <br /> 27 custodial fund. He thought this changed in 2021. He said that it needs to be accounted for in the <br /> 28 accounting system from the beginning rather than making it a manual adjustment process. <br />