Orange County NC Website
Docusign Envelope ID: BOF983D6-EAD9-4D5D-A13A-EE8461FA1918 <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner Dobbins Hill II LLC Appellant(if different) Morgan Fowler/Ryan <br /> LLC (Presented by <br /> Ca O'Day) <br /> Property Address 1749 Dobbins Drive Parcel ID or Abstract 9799593279 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on actual income from 2022, 2023, and 2024. <br /> Current Assessed Value $1,341,600 ounty Opinion $939,200 <br /> Time of Hearin 2:08 PM Appellant Opinion $1,043,600 <br /> County Representative Roger Gunn Board Decision $939,200 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • The appellant is requesting a lower valuation based on actual income from 2022, 2023, and <br /> 2024. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • The subject property consists of 12 units of a 32-unit Low Income Housing Tax Credit <br /> apartment community that was constructed in 2008. It is currently assessed at$1,341,600 or <br /> $111,800 per unit. The remaining 20 units of the project are located on PIN 9799584892. <br /> • In 2008 the NC General Assembly enacted G.S. 105-277.16 which dictates how properties <br /> with this special classification must be appraised, assessed, and taxed. Recommendations from <br /> the NCDOR based on the statute indicate that low-income and rent restricted properties that <br /> meet the special classification are to be valued utilizing the income approach, under which the <br /> restrictions in their rent must be considered. Furthermore, due to the special nature of these <br /> properties and their restrictions,NCDOR recommends that assessors utilize the real income <br /> and expenses presented in the audited income and expense documents,which should be <br /> provided. They also indicate that using a market-based capitalization rate would be <br /> appropriate. <br /> • Like the appellant,the County has considered the two properties that make up this project <br /> collectively. The County has reviewed the I&E documentation provided by the appellant. <br /> Based on the actual income and expenses,the basis of taxation rules for this Section 42 <br /> document,the County's income approach renders a value of$2,504,048 for the properties <br /> collectively. As the subject property contains 37.5% of the project's units, it seems reasonable <br /> that 37.5%of the value or$939,018 be allocated to the subject property. Applying the County's <br /> Schedule of Values,the County recommends, applying an E30 economic market adjustment <br /> which would result in a revised value of$939,200 or$78,267 per unit. <br /> • GIS Map of Subject <br /> • Current Property Record Card(2 pages) <br /> • Recommended Property Record Card(2 pages) <br /> • Income Approach <br /> Motion of the Board Accept County's Proposed Value: $939,200 <br /> Made the motion Richal Vanhook <br /> Seconded the motion Shannon Julian <br /> Voted For All BOER Members <br /> 7 <br />