Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Docusign Envelope ID:8DCOB92C-D1 E4-4E27-8958-A4C709699216 <br /> County Representative I Jimmy Milliken I Board Decision $177,500 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • Request reduction in value based on condition, age, and comparable sale. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • The subject property is located at 7803 Rogers Road in NBC 7032. The property was adjusted <br /> during the informal appeal review. The effective year built reflects the actual year built,the <br /> dwelling is in fair condition, and additional physical depreciation has been applied. <br /> • The Board of Equalization and Review subsequently ordered a neighborhood review,which <br /> resulted in a reduction to the land value. <br /> • Based on these adjustments, County staff recommends no further changes to the current <br /> assessed value. <br /> • Photo of Subject <br /> • GIS Map <br /> • Current Property Record Card <br /> Motion of the Board Value Changed as Follows: $177,500(additional 20%physical <br /> depreciation) <br /> Made the motion Leon Meyers <br /> Seconded the motion Shannon Julian <br /> Voted For All BOER Members <br /> Voted Against <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner Michael A. Allen Et Al Appellant if different ShirleySharpe owner <br /> Property Address 7805 Rogers Road Parcel ID or Abstract 19870441657 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on comparable property. <br /> Current Assessed Value $63,000 ounty Opinion $63,000 <br /> Time of Hearin 2:12 PM Appellant Opinion $53,000 <br /> County Representative Jimmy Milliken Board Decision $63,000 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • Request reduction in value based on comparable property. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • The subject property is a vacant lot located at 7805 Rogers Road. The property was adjusted at <br /> the informal appeal level, and the Board of Equalization and Review subsequently ordered an <br /> outside consultant to perform a neighborhood review for equity.As a result of that review, the <br /> subject property was adjusted to its current assessed value. <br /> • The comparable sale submitted by the appellant contains more acreage than the subject <br /> property. However,both parcels are valued using the AC-9 pricing table. <br /> 2 <br />