Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
APPROVED <br /> Q: Could the RFP approach uncover additional issues?Will known issues be confirmed <br /> through Folsom analysis? <br /> A: Yes, the RFP aims to produce actionable recommendations and confirm existing issues. <br /> Manger Myren noted this intent is in the current language but offered to clarify wording and <br /> share the relevant section. <br /> Hudson urged the consultant to go beyond verifying findings—fix known issues and <br /> uncover new ones. He noted the RFP should reflect verified neighborhood-level <br /> adjustments, not just resident complaints. <br /> Neighborhood reviews expected next week; final recommendations mayfollow later. <br /> Tanner Group offered suggestions despite not being asked for formal recommendations. <br /> Freeman confirmed reviews and summary documentation by next week; full <br /> recommendations may take additional time. <br /> Manager Myren affirmed consultant findings could lead to broader process changes in the <br /> Tax Office if issues are identified. <br /> Recommendations will go to the work group for review, then to the Board of <br /> Commissioners. Manager Myren retains discretion to adjust implementation based on <br /> practicality. <br /> Martha Bordogna stressed that appeals are governed by NC statute; any consultant <br /> recommendations must comply with state law. Proposed clarifying this point in the RFP <br /> wording. <br /> Catlin Saunders emphasized balancing technical expertise with public communication <br /> and fairness. Manager Myren confirmed RFP will be widely advertised and welcomed <br /> suggestions for outreach. <br /> Shereese Alston suggested consultants should access Hudson's and Tanner's research. <br /> Carter agreed and noted not all work group members have seen Hudson's findings; <br /> proposed considering a future agenda item for broader sharing. <br /> Saunders highlighted the need for consultants with rural expertise to address unique <br /> challenges. <br /> Commissioner Carter acknowledged the importance of sharing Hudson's and Tanner's <br /> research with both the consultant and the work group for context. <br /> • Discussions of Next steps <br /> 4 <br />