Browse
Search
Agenda 02-03-2026; 6-a - Approval of the School Construction Interlocal Agreement
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2026
>
Agenda - 02-03-2026 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 02-03-2026; 6-a - Approval of the School Construction Interlocal Agreement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2026 3:53:23 PM
Creation date
1/29/2026 3:57:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/3/2026
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
6-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for February 3, 2026 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2026\Agenda - 02-03-2026 Business Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br /> This draft was provided to members of the Board of County Commissioners and staff of both <br /> school districts. The school district staff have requested three additional changes to the ILA, for <br /> the Board of Commissioners' consideration. Those changes are: <br /> • 4.01 i d & e - Amending the approval to appropriation. This is meant to clarify that by the <br /> Board of County Commissioners approving funding for projects in the budget, they are <br /> approving the projects. <br /> • 4.01 iii - Changing the design payment timing as design is paid at milestones, not all at <br /> once. <br /> • 4.01 v - Removing the requirement for Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR), changing <br /> it to a recommendation. School staff have identified that there would be projects that use <br /> bond funds that are not new construction, such as HVAC and Roof replacements, where <br /> CMAR would not be a reasonable procurement method. The attorney for both school <br /> districts additionally contends that General Statute 143-128.1(e) does not permit any <br /> public entity to delegate the determination of appropriate construction method. <br /> As design funds have been authorized by the Board of County Commissioners, both school <br /> districts have proceeded with design of their first school construction project. County staff have <br /> met with school staff in December as a precursor to the formal CORE team. School staff have <br /> committed to following the structure of the School Capital Funding Policy and have already <br /> committed to using CMAR as the construction method for both first elementary school builds. <br /> Both districts will be releasing requests for proposals (RFPs) to select a construction manager <br /> at risk in the spring. <br /> Along with the ILA, the County reviewed options in managing this process, and determined that <br /> it would be preferable to have staff provide oversight and communication during the project <br /> construction, rather than hiring a project management firm. The Manager recommends adding a <br /> 1.0 FTE (full time equivalent) School Capital and Financial Analyst to coordinate the meetings of <br /> the CORE Team, report back to the Board on school construction, and manage all public <br /> communications, including maintenance of a dashboard and all non-online materials. This <br /> position would also consolidate other school related tasks that currently reside in different <br /> departments, such as the coordination of the Schools Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance <br /> Technical Advisory Committee (SAPFOTAC) and the reporting of capital expenditures for <br /> financing and reimbursement. This proposed position would be funded from Pay-Go funds set <br /> aside for Project Management. Funds totaling $500,000 were budgeted in FY 2026, and <br /> $1,000,000 is planned annually for future years. The County would retain approximately $36,000 <br /> for a position starting on February 3, 2026 for FY 2026, and retain approximately $90,000 <br /> annually in future years from that pool to fund the position. The remaining funds will be allocated <br /> to the School Districts for project and program management expenses. These funds were set <br /> aside from school project budgets to ensure that the districts would adequately invest in project <br /> and program management functions. The Manager recommends that the position be approved <br /> by the Board with approval to proceed with the ILA. <br /> FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact associated with discussion of the Interlocal <br /> Agreement. The School Capital and Financial Analyst position would utilize funds already <br /> budgeted in the FY 2025-26 budget. <br /> ALIGNMENT WITH STRATEGIC PLAN: This item supports: <br /> • GOAL 5: PUBLIC EDUCATION/LEARNING COMMUNITY <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.