2025_12_18 BOER Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Docusign Envelope ID: BE7173ED-52F6-47B6-A7EB-347CE2C7F857 Evidence submitted by the appellant: • Smallest unit • Habitat home • Values based on Waterstone units Evidence submitted by the county representative: • The value was reduced during the BOER ordered revaluation of Habitat Homes to$149,100 which is less than the appellant's opinion of value. She agreed to go on the Consent Agenda but did not return the form before the scheduled appeal. • No further change in value. Motion of the Board Accept County's Proposed Value: $149,100 No change in value Made the motion Richal Vanhook Seconded the motion Saru Salvi Voted For All BOER Members Voted Against ... Property Identification: Property Owner Robert Medred Appellant(if different Property Address 1121 NC 86 N Parcel ID or Abstract 19865861928 Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on the position that comparable sales do not justify the County's market value.No supporting documentation was provided. Current Assessed Value $642,000 ounty Opinion $642,000 Time of Hearin 10:05 AM Appellant Opinion $550,000 County Representative Cyle Anderson Board Decision $642,000 Evidence submitted by the appellant: • The appellant states that sales of comparable property do not justify the County's market value. No supporting documentation was provided with this appeal. Evidence submitted by the county representative: • The subject property is a 13.31-acre tract improved with a 2,888-square-foot single-family dwelling, located at 1121 Highway 86 North in Hillsborough. The appellant did not submit any supporting documentation with this appeal. • County staff reviewed a sales analysis of three properties located within the subject's neighborhood. Comparable sale one is improved with a dwelling that is larger than the subject and of a lower grade, resulting in a lower price per square foot when compared to the subject property. Comparable sales two and three are vacant land sales that are substantially smaller than the subject and have less road frontage; as a result,these properties exhibit a higher price- per-acre. All three comparable sales share the same AC-9 land pricing base rate as the subject property. • After review of the available market data, and in the absence of supporting documentation from the appellant, County staff recommends no change to the current assessed value of $642,000.