Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Docusign Envelope ID: BE7173ED-52F6-47B6-A7EB-347CE2C7F857 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on comparable property directly across the street <br /> from the subject. <br /> Current Assessed Value $405,300 County Opinion $383,500 <br /> Time of Hearin 9:24 AM Appellant Opinion $356,100 <br /> County Representative Kelly Wells Board Decision $383,500 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • This request is based on comparison of my property to 2208 Pathway Drive,which is located <br /> directly across the street, and which was sold on July 17, 2025, for$440,000 ($268 per square <br /> foor), an appraised square footage of 1,642 while mine is 1,152 square feet. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • The subject property is a 1,152 square foot townhome with 2 bedrooms, 2 and 1/2 baths built in <br /> 1988 located in the Fairoaks Subdivision in Chapel Hill. <br /> • Based on recent sales of similar units (2224 Pathway),The County recommends: <br /> *Increasing the land adjustment from-10%to -15% <br /> *Reducing the effective year built from 1995 to 1993 <br /> • Resulting in a reduction in value from$405,300 to$389,700 <br /> • Photo of Subject <br /> • GIS Map <br /> • Sales and Equity Analysis <br /> • Current Property Record Card <br /> • Proposed Property Record Card <br /> Motion of the Board Accept Coun 's Proposed Value: $383,500 <br /> Made the motion Richal Vanhook <br /> Seconded the motion Saru Salvi <br /> Voted For All BOER Members <br /> Voted Against <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner I William D. Westbrook Sr. A ellant if different) <br /> Property Address 6702 East Washington Parcel ID or Abstract 9835006065 <br /> Street Extension <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on parcel location, zoning, and condition. <br /> Current Assessed Value $93,900 ounty Opinion $53,200 <br /> Time of Hearin 9:42 AM Appellant Opinion $37,120 <br /> County Representative C le Anderson Board Decision $53,200 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • The appellant states that the land value is overstated given its location. The appellant also <br /> states that the zoning for this lot is industrial but has a single-family dwelling here. The <br />