Orange County NC Website
Docusign Envelope ID: D8F1F6B3-4E5C-46D1-9276-28B887499D7C <br /> Property Owner West Franklin Appellant(if different) <br /> Preservation Partners <br /> Property Address 200 West Franklin Street Parcel ID or Abstract 9788265985 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on the office and retail building being 73.5% <br /> vacant for the past 3 years. <br /> Current Assessed Value $8,130,300 County Opinion $6,565,900 <br /> Time of Hearin 1:18 PM Appellant Opinion $5,471,665 <br /> County Representative Roger Gunn Board Decision $6,565,900 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • The appellant's opinion of value is based on the office and retail building being 73.5%vacant <br /> for the past 3 years. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • The subject property is recorded as a 30,981 square foot retail and office building office built <br /> in 1998 on.41 acres located on W. Franklin Street in Chapel Hill. <br /> • The owner has not presented any evidence but has represented that the property is 73.5% <br /> vacant. It is clear that a new lease was signed for the entire third floor(or the vast majority of <br /> it) and has been occupied since mid-2025. However, it is not clear when the lease was <br /> committed to by the tenant(whether committed in 2024 or 2025). <br /> • The County's current recorded gross building area is incorrect. Leasing materials indicate a <br /> floor plan of around 14,361 for the third floor and GIS measurements seem to back this up. <br /> Thus, gross building area is estimated to be 43,083 square feet(14,361 x 3 stories). Leasing <br /> materials further indicate that there is at least 10,167 square feet of leasable area on the first <br /> floor. For the purposes of this appeal, a size of 38,000 leasable square feet has been utilized <br /> for calculation of value by the income approach. <br /> • An Income Approach is attached. Vacancy has been estimated at 25%,which is very high on <br /> Franklin Street and gives strong deference to the property's history of high vacancy. Beyond <br /> that,the other inputs used in the Income Approach are fairly standard for the market. <br /> • Based on the Income Approach,the indicated value is$6,555,392. As a result,the County <br /> recommends correcting the gross building area to 43,083 square feet and applying 5 1% <br /> economic depreciation. These changes would result in a revised value of$6,565,900. <br /> • GIS Map of Subject <br /> • Current Property Record Card <br /> • Proposed Property Record Card <br /> • Income Approach <br /> Motion of the Board Accept Coun 's Proposed Value: $6,565,900 <br /> Made the motion Richal Vanhook <br /> Seconded the motion Saru Salvi <br /> Voted For All BOER Members <br /> Voted Against <br /> Property Identification: <br />