Browse
Search
Minutes 11-14-2025-Work Session
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2020's
>
2025
>
Minutes 11-14-2025-Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2026 8:50:46 AM
Creation date
1/22/2026 8:45:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/14/2025
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
1 & 2 - Orange County Land Use Plan 2050 – Board Request for Additional Information
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 11-14-2025 BOCC Mini-Retreat
Agenda for November 14, 2025 Mini-Retreat Meeting
(Attachment)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2025\Agenda - 11-14-2025 BOCC Mini-Retreat
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> which is the focus for Orange County. He highlighted a significant regulatory change with the <br /> engineered option permit (EOP), which came about 8-9 years ago. Under this system, private <br /> engineers can design systems, avoid the regulatory review process by essentially standing in the <br /> shoes of the regulatory agency, administer their own quality control of the drawings that they <br /> produced, and issue a permit for construction for that system. He noted that state regulatory staff <br /> now review only about 10 percent of big system designs, with about 90 percent going under this <br /> private option. He emphasized that this is a significant change. <br /> Slide #6 <br /> Individual System vs. Community System <br /> Conventional 1p� ClusteT Septic <br /> Septic System r System <br /> ■ ■ <br /> -MN M�Wlon <br /> ML <br /> Tony Whitaker explained that in an individual system, each house would have its own <br /> septic tank and private distribution lines extending into the yard for dispersal. In contrast, a <br /> community system serving four homes would have individual septic tanks for each home that <br /> connect to a more centralized, compact dispersal field. This system is supported by common <br /> pumping and control mechanisms that manage the effluent distribution, allowing the cluster <br /> dispersal field to effectively serve all four homes as a single entity. This setup not only requires a <br /> smaller total land area but also enhances land use efficiency, particularly when advanced <br /> treatment levels are implemented, allowing for more compact neighborhood designs. <br /> Chair Bedford asked about the relationship between topography and well water placement <br /> relative to septic drain systems. <br /> Tony Whitaker explained that while it's generally preferred for wells to be uphill from septic <br /> systems, one can't always infer that groundwater is flowing like surface water is flowing. He <br /> emphasized that horizontal separation is the key factor for protecting wells from wastewater <br /> systems. <br /> Chair Bedford asked about whether developers grade plots to use gravity flow. <br /> Tony Whitaker said that it is preferred but not always feasible, and many community <br /> systems use STEP (septic tank effluent pump) systems to get effluent from individual homes to <br /> common dispersal areas. <br /> Commissioner Greene said the Fiddlehead project proposal had that sort of system where <br /> there was a pump between individual homes and the field. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.