Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-15-2003-5f
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2003
>
Agenda - 04-15-2003
>
Agenda - 04-15-2003-5f
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/29/2008 3:29:45 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:45:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/15/2003
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
5f
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20030415
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2003
RES-2003-032 Legislative Items opposing Special interest legislation
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2003
RES-2003-033 Legislative Items supporting Senate Bills 384 and 34 version 2
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2003
RES-2003-034 Legislative Items Opposing House Bill 863 Version 1
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
rtw~~rrvr.~ <br />Durham loop on fast track <br />Wednesday, April 2, 2003 6:57AM EST <br />By RAH BICKLEY, Staff Writer <br />DURHAM -- Racing through the state legislature is a bill that could solve Durham's 30-year deadlock over a loop <br />road that state transportation planners have pushed and local leaders and environmentalists have bitterly fought. <br />The bill, which would establish a new route for aquarter-loop road across the northeastern part of the county, <br />passed the Senate unanimously Tuesday and is slated for a hearing in the House Transportation Committee <br />today. <br />"It could be law in two weeks," said Rep. Paul Luebke of Durham, one of the county's four state representatives <br />who are pushing an identical bill to the Senate bill that passed Tuesday, sponsored by Durham Sens. Wib Gulley <br />and Jeanne Lucas. <br />The Senate bill enshrines in state law a new route, called the Northern Durham Parkway, which was hammered <br />out over months in a compromise between Durham leaders and residents and state transportation planners. The <br />Northern Durham Parkway arcs eastward from Roxboro Road, which bisects the county north to south, turns <br />south to cross Interstate 85 and continues down to I-540. <br />"Boy, is that great news!" said Ellen Reckhow, chairwoman of the Durham County Board of Commissioners, when <br />she learned of the Senate vote. Gulley's bill amounts to a list of improvements that will relieve traffic congestion in <br />northern and eastern Durham, she said. <br />It is to be built in seven segments, in a specific order. The first segment to be built under the compromise is the <br />East End Connector, aone-mile segment connecting U.S. 70 to the Durham Freeway. It would provide a quick <br />route bypassing downtown on the way from northern Durham County to Research Triangle Park and I-40, <br />supporters say. <br />The bill erases the old, long-resisted route called Eno Drive, which drew a semicircle around the top of the county, <br />starting from U.S. 70 in the east and ending in Orange County in the west. The northern part of Eno Drive went <br />close to the Eno River -- too close for the taste of the Eno's defenders in the Eno River Association, who said the <br />road would harm the river, its tributaries, the park, wildlife and nearby neighborhoods. <br />"I think it's the solution that's going to provide the best traffic benefit for the least environmental impact," said Don <br />Moffitt, association president. The original Eno Drive loop road was mandated by an earlier law that decreed that <br />Durham should have one of seven loop roads in the state. But the drawn-out fight over the state-drawn route <br />versus other routes preferred by residents kept the issue up in the air and jeopardized the millions in state highway <br />money that came along with it. <br />The bill, Reckhow said, "will sign, seal and deliver the compromise and move the project forward." <br />A© Copyright 2003, The News & Observer Publishing Company. All material found ortrianole.com (including newsobserver.com, <br />carvnews.com, cha~elhillnews.com, smithfieldherald.com, and easternwakenews.com) is copyrighted The News & Observer Publishing <br />Company and associated news services. No material may be reproduced or reused without explicit permission from The News & Observer <br />Publishing Company, Raleigh, North Carolina. <br />The News & Observer Publishing Company is owned byThe McClatchv Comoany. <br />BACK <br />1 of 1 4/3/2003 3:20 PM <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.