|
54
<br /> Electric Vehicle Transition Plan&Charging Infrastructure Evaluation for County Fleet RFQ 367-005463
<br /> Response to Request for Qualifications November 5,2025
<br /> collected from the County. This is typically a trivial process for light-duty vehicles but incorporates many
<br /> criteria for medium and heavy-duty vehicles such as:
<br /> • Vehicle body type
<br /> • Daily mileage
<br /> • Maximum operating range
<br /> • Auxiliary power loads
<br /> • Towing/hauling capacity
<br /> • Use case
<br /> ICF will evaluate manufacturer warranties and support for long-term service when recommending vehicle
<br /> options. Additionally, ICF will suggest plans for on-site vehicle repair, maintenance, and replacement,
<br /> detailing required resources (e.g., tools and equipment) and staffing (e.g., training and certificates)for the
<br /> Operations Center Fleet Maintenance Facility. We will identify and recommend the necessary modifications
<br /> of current procedures to meet the needs of EVs. This evaluation will cover a range of considerations,
<br /> including updates to equipment, adjustments to the layout, enhancements to safety measures, and other
<br /> relevant factors, ensuring that the facilities are fully prepared to accommodate the unique requirements of
<br /> EVs. Based on barriers and priorities identified through conversation with County staff, ICF will offer further
<br /> recommendations to the County, including best practices for risk mitigation during EV adoption.
<br /> Total Cost of Ownership (TCO)Analysis: ICF's PowerGuide Analytics also provides us with the
<br /> capability to estimate the total cost of owning and operating each replacement vehicle, including upfront
<br /> and lifecycle costs as well as the capital and installation cost of EV charging infrastructure. The cost data
<br /> embedded in the PowerGuide is informed by Exhibit 9. Example of TCO Analysis
<br /> available cost data from manufacturers (both
<br /> vehicles and charging manufacturers), $14,000,000
<br /> dealerships, and the data collected from the $12,000,000
<br /> municipality fleets across the country. This TCO My.''
<br /> analysis, as shown in Exhibit 9, will compare $10,000,000 $1,633,157
<br /> the differences in TCO over the service life of $1,859,015 \ $1,427,580
<br /> each vehicle between EV replacements and a $8,000,000
<br /> scenario where the County only replace their $1,166,594
<br /> vehicles with ICE vehicles. The ICF team will $6,000,000
<br /> $2,697,017 647,452.
<br /> estimate TCO on a vehicle-by-vehicle basis and
<br /> will consolidate these vehicle-level estimates $4,000,000
<br /> into fleet-level transition cost estimates. On top9"
<br /> 59
<br /> of this, we add in estimates of additional costs $2,000,000
<br /> like downtime, labor costs to shuttle equipment
<br /> for repair and a comparison of residual value to $-
<br /> provide critical data that the County needs to $(2,000,000)
<br /> plan its budget into the future. The team will ICE Replacements EV Replacements
<br /> provide high-level estimates and ■Rebates and Incentives
<br /> recommendations on the end-of-life salvage and ■Make Ready and Facility/Utility Costs
<br /> disposal of EVs and their batteries, compared to Charging Infrastructure Installation
<br /> ICE vehicles. Charging Infrastructure Hardware
<br /> PowerGuide does not restrict evaluating TCO NPV Maintenance Costs
<br /> under the traditional ownership model, but it can NPV Fuel Costs
<br /> ■Capital Cost
<br /> CONFIDENTIAL 19
<br />
|