Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
22 <br /> 1 Slide #8 <br /> Proposed UDO Text Amendments <br /> Articles & Sections Affected <br /> —Article 2 <br /> • 2.20 (Stream Buffers — Use Authorization Cert.) <br /> —Article 4 <br /> • 4.2 (Watershed Protection) <br /> —Article 6 <br /> • 6.13 (Stream Buffers) <br /> —Article 10 ("Water Feature") <br /> • 23 pages affected in totalIft <br /> , <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> NORTH.CAROLINA <br /> 2 <br /> 3 <br /> 4 Slide #9 <br /> Proposed UDO Text Amendments <br /> Elimination of "Sliding <br /> Scale" — Section 4.2 <br /> • Origin of table is unknown, not <br /> statute-based, created in mid-1990s <br /> in response to WPOD enforcement "« <br /> • Originally intended to deal with non- " <br /> conforming lots from density and ,°.• <br /> If]bl ib} 1bMi <br /> impervious area perspectives <br /> • With new legislation, keeping the <br /> sliding scale would give a"double <br /> bump"to impervious allowances <br /> • Table was difficult to understand/use <br /> • Replaced with 12% impervious cap <br /> for all non-conforming dots <br /> Provides clarity/consistencyfor non- ORANGE COUNTY <br /> N(lWTH CAROLINA <br /> 5 conforming lots <br /> 6 <br /> 7 <br />