Browse
Search
Agenda 01-20-2026; 8-a - Minutes for November 14, 2025, November 18, 2025, November 21, 2025, December 1, 2025, and December 9, 2025 Meetings
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2020's
>
2026
>
Agenda - 01-20-2026 Business Meeting
>
Agenda 01-20-2026; 8-a - Minutes for November 14, 2025, November 18, 2025, November 21, 2025, December 1, 2025, and December 9, 2025 Meetings
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/15/2026 10:53:53 AM
Creation date
1/15/2026 10:56:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/20/2026
Meeting Type
Business
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8-a
Document Relationships
Agenda for January 20, 2026 BOCC Meeting
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2020's\2026\Agenda - 01-20-2026 Business Meeting
ORD-2026-001-Fiscal Year 2025-26 Budget Amendment #6
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2026
ORD-2026-002-Ordinance Execution for Unified Development Ordinance Text Amendments Impervious Surfaces, Watershed Protection Overlay Districts and stream buffers
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2026
ORD-2026-003-Revised Opioid Settlement Fund Spending Authorization Resolution and Approval of Budget Amendment #6-A
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Ordinances\Ordinance 2020-2029\2026
OTHER-2026-001-Presentation of Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for FYE 6302025 and
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2026
OTHER-2026-003-Advertisement of Tax Liens on Real Property
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Various Documents\2020 - 2029\2026
PRO-2026-001-International Holocaust Remembrance Day Proclamation
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Proclamations\2020-2029\2026
RES-2026-002-Property Tax Releases-Refunds
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2026
RES-2026-003-Late Applications for Property Tax Exemption-Exclusion
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2026
RES-2026-004-Extension of 2026 Tax Listing Period
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2026
RES-2026-005-Revised Opioid Settlement Fund Spending Authorization Resolution and Approval of Budget Amendment #6-A
(Message)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2020-2029\2026
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
260
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
19 <br /> 1 part of the evidentiary hearing is evidence provided by the applicant and an analysis by Chris <br /> 2 Sandt or Victoria Hudson, Director of Environmental Health, that no public safety or welfare <br /> 3 concerns are presented by this encroachment into this particular and peculiar buffer that really <br /> 4 only resides on this individual water body in the entire county at this point. He estimated it would <br /> 5 add thousands of dollars of additional costs to a renovation project or a new home, in some cases. <br /> 6 He pointed out that new homes are being constructed and are seeking variances in this setback, <br /> 7 and it adds a minimum of three months to the timeline so that a Board of Adjustment hearing can <br /> 8 be held. <br /> 9 Patrick Mallett explained that the burden extends beyond major renovations. <br /> 10 Commissioner McKee asked for an example of a minor change that would require this <br /> 11 level of involvement. <br /> 12 Cy Stober said even minor improvements like wrapping a porch, paving a driveway, or <br /> 13 adding a patio require the full variance process. <br /> 14 Commissioner McKee said it is possible that this process could cost as much as the <br /> 15 change a property owner is trying to make. <br /> 16 Cy Stober said that it is true in theory. <br /> 17 Vice-Chair Hamilton asked about setback requirements. <br /> 18 Patrick Mallett said explained that existing homes built with 75-foot setbacks in the 1970s- <br /> 19 80s are non-conforming under the current 150-foot requirements. For new construction on vacant <br /> 20 lots, current rules effectively make many unbuildable due to the combined setback requirements. <br /> 21 Vice-Chair Hamilton asked if these homes are becoming less safe by making setbacks <br /> 22 closer. <br /> 23 Christopher Sandt assured that the major CIP repairs to the Lake's dam had been <br /> 24 completed, with the entire embankment reinforced. Without these improvements, the dam might <br /> 25 not have survived Helene. He explained that during that storm, water approached but didn't <br /> 26 significantly flood homes closest to the lake. <br /> 27 Vice-Chair Hamilton thanked him for the explanation. <br /> 28 Commissioner Greene initially wondered why vacant lots couldn't maintain 150-foot <br /> 29 setbacks while existing homes had different standards, but understood the lots were too small <br /> 30 and maintaining consistent buffers around the reservoir was necessary. <br /> 31 Patrick Mallett added that the smaller lots are the only ones that are left, which do not <br /> 32 accommodate large homes. <br /> 33 Commissioner McKee noted the lake was built in the mid-1960s with lots platted before <br /> 34 the current regulations. He said this is a longstanding issue rather than a recent development. <br /> 35 <br /> 36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.