Orange County NC Website
Project Benefits:The E-bike lending library gives residents free, short-term access to e-bikes, reducing car trips,12 <br /> emissions, and transportation costs. Exposure to multiple bike types helps users discover accessible, healthier travel <br /> options.The program also supports local bike shops and increases community adoption of low-emission mobility. <br /> Reviewer Comments: GHG reduction is based on total project lifetime, but the funding request is only for an <br /> additional year of operations.The CFE was concerned about the sustainability of the e-bike program long-term and <br /> what would happen if the project ended due to lack of funding. Most of the reduction in gasoline is tied to people <br /> purchasing their own a-bikes and assumptions (e.g., number of e-bikes purchased) are not substantiated with data. <br /> The HRC commented that having targeted communities that are low-income or partnership ideas to target minority <br /> populations could be considered. <br /> #13 Ranked Project —Town of Carrboro— E-bike Voucher and Education Program <br /> Applicant(Collaborators): Back Alley Bikes, Shift Chapel Hill-Carrboro <br /> Funding Requested: $33,400 <br /> Recommended Funding Level: $0 <br /> Total Score (Out of 26 pts): 16.09 <br /> Project Description:This pilot will provide 20 income-eligible residents with vouchers for free e-bikes, reducing <br /> transportation insecurity and emissions. Modeled on successful programs in Raleigh and Durham,the initiative will <br /> include safety gear, outreach, and workshops. <br /> Project Benefits: Providing e-bike vouchers to low-income residents will replace car trips, reducing over 100 metric <br /> tons of CO2 and improving air quality.The program expands mobility for people who cannot afford cars or electric <br /> vehicles, improving access to work, healthcare, and daily needs. Supporting local bike shops keeps economic benefits <br /> within Carrboro. <br /> Reviewer Comments:The CFE and HRC scores were closely aligned and suggested a comparatively lower return relative to <br /> other proposals. Reviewers noted that the cost per recipient is relatively high and would be most impactful if the program <br /> encouraged broader e-bike adoption.The HRC also emphasized the importance of meaningful community engagement and <br /> raised questions about the extent to which the program would reach communities of color or advance social justice and racial <br /> equity goals. <br /> #14 Ranked Project —The ArtsCenter— Cellular Blinds <br /> Applicant(Collaborators): N/A <br /> Funding Requested: $21,800 <br /> Recommended Funding Level: $0 <br /> Total Score (Out of 26 pts): 15.73 <br /> Project Description:The ArtsCenter plans to install high-efficiency cellular shades to improve building energy <br /> performance. Installation will be done by a long-standing local,veteran-owned business. <br /> Project Benefits: Installing high-efficiency cellular shades will reduce heat loss in winter and heat gain in summer, <br /> lowering energy use throughout the building. Oak Ridge National Laboratory found that cellular shades outperform <br /> vinyl blinds, delivering up to 20% heating energy savings and up to 15%total heating-and-cooling energy savings <br /> compared to homes without shades. <br /> Reviewer Comments:The CFE did not feel this was a high priority project, given limited funding and the quality of <br /> other applications.The HRC rank was low and GHG reductions were minimal.The Arts Center has been a grant <br /> recipient in the past and the CFE wanted to give others an opportunity. <br />