Browse
Search
Agenda - 06-27-2002 - 9d
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 06-27-2002
>
Agenda - 06-27-2002 - 9d
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2017 2:08:30 PM
Creation date
8/29/2008 10:45:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
6/27/2002
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
9d
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20020627
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
RES-2002-054 Tuscany Ridge Subdivision Resolution
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Resolutions\2000-2009\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
19 <br /> FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR TUSCANY RIDGE <br /> RESIDENTIAL SERVICE STANDARD APPROACH <br /> Prepared by <br /> The Orange County Planning Department <br /> 3une, 2002 <br /> PROJECT DESCRIPTION <br /> Tuscany Ridge subdivision contains 22 buildable lots and is located in Chapel Hill <br /> Township. The lots are accessed by new public roads which will intersect with Arthur Minnis <br /> Road. The current zoning is RB — Rural Buffer. The average lot size is approximately 2.31 <br /> acres including open space. Lots will be served by individual wells and individual septic <br /> systems. <br /> Project build-out is estimated at four years. Housing units will be constructed, <br /> beginning in 2002, with completion of the project scheduled for 2005. Units will consist of <br /> detached single-family homes, and the applicant estimates the average sales price to be <br /> $500,000 including the lot. <br /> METHODOLOGY <br /> Fiscal impact analysis is a projection of the direct, current, public costs and revenues <br /> associated with residential and non residential growth in the jurisdiction in which the growth <br /> is taking place. Fiscal impact analysis considers only direct impact in that it projects only the <br /> primary costs that will be incurred and the immediate revenues that will be generated. It <br /> calculates the financial effect of a planned development or new subdivision by considering <br /> the current costs and revenues such a development would generate if it were completed and <br /> occupied today. Fiscal impact analysis does not consider the private costs of public action. It <br /> is concerned only with public (governmental) costs and revenues. <br /> The method used in preparing the fiscal impact analysis is the Service Standard <br /> Approach. While only gross expenditures by service category are derived from the Per Capita <br /> Method, the Service Standard method determines the total number of additional employees <br /> by service function that will be required as a result of growth. This method employs average <br /> county government costs per person, average school costs per pupil, an employee to <br /> population ratio, and average operating expenses per employee for each service category <br /> and school district. The number of new employees are projected and multiplied times the <br /> average operating expenses (includes personnel, operating and capital costs) per employee. <br /> These average costs are then weighed against per capita and per pupil revenues to project <br /> the total net fiscal impact of the development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.