2025_11_19 BOER Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Docusign Envelope ID: F69F6FC6-EFB7-4BA4-AC17-3EC64A01A42C Made the motion Saru Salvi Seconded the motion Richal Vanhook Voted For All BOER Members Voted Against ... Property Identification: Property Owner Frank Theodore Jean Appellant(if different) Property Address 1331 Rose Walk Lane I Parcel ID or Abstract 19778421162 Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on condition/maintenance, recent purchase, comparable sales, and online value estimate. Current Assessed Value $396,600 ounty Opinion 1 $374,000 Time of Hearin 3:06 PM Appellant Opinion $364,200 County Representative Scott Zeman Board Decision $374,000 Evidence submitted by the appellant: • Condition/Maintenance: We experienced catastrophic damage in January of this year due to burst fire suppression sprinklers in the attic. This resulted in all three floors being taken down to the studs and all flooring removed. This will no doubt have an impact on our ability to sell the house, should our advanced age require we look for a single floor residence. • Recent Purchase: Our townhome was listed at $315,000 when we purchased it on 6/20/2022. This was at the peak of the COVID bubble, and houses stopped being bid up soon after. Given our age and the age of our nearby grandchildren,we felt we did not have the time to wait for things to settle and bid over$60,000 above the listing price. It is unreasonable to expect to be able to recover that overbid in two and a half years,much less sell for the current tax appraisal. • Recent Comparable Sale: • Five properties used as comparables in current tax appraisal (see attached comparable report) sold for an average of$209 per square foot. Three nearby townhomes sold recently that are closer in size to mine: 218, 300, 306 Cedarwood Ln -average price per sq ft= $224 per square foot. • Realtor.com estimates the value of the property at$364,200. Evidence submitted by the county representative: • A county appraiser conducted a site review of the property on 11/12/2025. The appellant was at home and allowed access to the exterior and interior of the property. Photographs were taken by the appraiser. No interior photographs were provided. • Appraiser observations and recommendations: