Browse
Search
2025_12_17 BOER Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Equalization and Review
>
Minutes
>
2025
>
2025_12_17 BOER Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/31/2025 2:29:14 PM
Creation date
12/31/2025 2:24:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/17/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Docusign Envelope ID:OA23A6A2-42FE-4EAO-B414-FA2F89F77BF7 <br /> Motion of the Board Accept Count 's Proposed Value: $3,751,200 <br /> Made the motion Shannon Julian <br /> Seconded the motion Leon Meyers <br /> Voted For All BOER Members <br /> Voted Against ... <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner TBV LLC Appellant(if different) <br /> Property Address 710 Market Street Parcel ID or Abstract 9787053344.001 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on an independent fee appraisal. <br /> Current Assessed Value $1,961,300 ounty Opinion $1,863,200 <br /> Time of Hearin 9:28 AM Appellant Opinion $1,590,000 <br /> County Representative Roger Gunn Board Decision $1,740,000 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • The appellant is requesting a reduction in value based on an independent fee appraisal as of <br /> January 1, 2025,with an indicated value of$1,590,000 from both the sales comparison and <br /> income approaches. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • The appellant has submitted an appraisal,which is considered reliable,but with two <br /> exceptions: <br /> 1.)Vacancy and Collection loss at 8%seems to be too high. Retail vacancy in Orange County <br /> was less than 2%at the end of 2024. <br /> 2.) The expenses are high, and the appraiser does not present support for why this simple <br /> property runs higher expenses than everything else. <br /> • The County has prepared an income approach that uses a more typical vacancy estimate and <br /> more typical expenses for retail. The suggested valuation from the County's income approach <br /> is $1,875,824. As a result,the County recommends applying 5% economic depreciation to the <br /> subject for a revised assessed value of$1,863,200. <br /> • Location Map of Subject <br /> • Current Property Record Card <br /> • Recommended Property Record Card <br /> • Income Approach <br /> Motion of the Board Value Changed as Follows: $1,740,000 (Per expenses for type of <br /> development <br /> Made the motion Leon Meyers <br /> Seconded the motion Shannon Julian <br /> Voted For All BOER Members <br /> Voted Against <br /> Property Identification: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.