Browse
Search
2025_12_17 BOER Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Advisory Boards and Commissions - Active
>
Board of Equalization and Review
>
Minutes
>
2025
>
2025_12_17 BOER Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/31/2025 2:29:14 PM
Creation date
12/31/2025 2:24:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
12/17/2025
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Advisory Bd. Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Docusign Envelope ID:OA23A6A2-42FE-4EAO-B414-FA2F89F77BF7 <br /> Property Identification: <br /> Property Owner S V Center LLC Appellant(if different) <br /> Property Address 400 Market Street Unit Parcel ID or Abstract 9787056725 <br /> 100 <br /> Statement of Appeal: Request reduction in value based on an independent fee appraisal. <br /> Current Assessed Value $4,580,100 ounty Opinion $3,751,200 <br /> Time of Hearin 9:12 AM Appellant Opinion $3,650,000 <br /> County Representative Roger Gunn Board Decision $3,751,200 <br /> Evidence submitted by the appellant: <br /> • The appellant is requesting a reduction in value based on an independent fee appraisal as of <br /> January 1, 2025,with an indicated value of$3,550,000 from the sales comparison approach, <br /> $3,700,000 from the income approach and a reconciled value of$3,650,000. <br /> Evidence submitted by the county representative: <br /> • The appellant has submitted an appraisal into evidence. Generally speaking,the report aligns <br /> with the County's schedule of values and is considered reasonable evidence. However, there <br /> are three key points that seem to create a greater difference in the County assessment and the <br /> owner's estimate of value than might otherwise exist. <br /> 1.) The appraisal downplays the retail component of the property,which includes long-term <br /> tenants such as Subway. There is over 24%retail in this building,which has lower vacancy <br /> rates and capitalization rates than office spaces enjoy. CoStar Market Reports show that near <br /> end 2024 vacancy sat at 1.3%in Orange County. There was very little new construction and <br /> asking rates were on the rise. <br /> 2.) It doesn't give enough credit to the walkable location,which is considered very desirable <br /> for office space. It is considered one of the main amenities that separates desirable from <br /> undesirable office locations. <br /> 3.) The property has some medical (dental) space. Medical office buildings (MOBS)greatly <br /> outperform typical office in terms of vacancy, rents and capitalization rates. <br /> • The attached income approach uses the same income as the appraisal but adjusts the vacancy <br /> from 10%to 7%to better reflect the medical and retail nature of this walkable building. <br /> Expenses are similar. Comparables for the extraction of the capitalization rate are also <br /> provided. <br /> • The indicated value from the income approach is$3,757,583. As a result,the County <br /> recommends increasing the economic depreciation of the buildings from 35%to 49%for a <br /> revised value of$3,751,200. <br /> • Location Map of Subject <br /> • Current Property Record Card(8 pages) <br /> • Proposed Property Record Card(8 pages) <br /> • Income Approach <br /> • Com arables for Office Capitalization Rate <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.